PREMIUM-Episode 77: Santayana on the Appreciation of Beauty

episode

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

More from The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

Ep. 400: Dennett Rejects Qualia (Part Two) 51 min · 21 Sep 2026

PEL Presents Closereads: Late Dennett on Consciousness (Part One) 55 min · 20 Sep 2026

PEL Presents PMP#230: Gettin' Furious 49 min · 18 Sep 2026

Ep. 400: Dennett Rejects Qualia (Part One) 52 min · 14 Sep 2026

PEL Presents PvI#124: Navel Evaluation (Our Season 5 Finale) 53 min · 12 Sep 2026

PEL Presents NEM#260: Jacqui Hunt (Single Gun Theory) Now Master of Her Synth Domain 1h 4m · 11 Sep 2026

All episodes from The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast →

Report any issue

Source

Recorded09 Jun 2013

Publisherpartiallyexaminedlife.libsyn.com ↗

Handlerec:5514933

Show notes

On George Santayana's The Sense of Beauty (1896). What are we saying when we call something "beautiful?" Are we pointing out an objective quality that other people (anyone?) can ferret out, or just essentially saying "yay!" without any logic necessarily behind our exclamation? The poet and philosopher Santayana thought that while aesthetic appreciation is an immediate experience--we don't "infer" the beauty of something by recognizing some natural qualities that it has--we can nonetheless analyze the experience after the fact to uncover a number of grounds on which we might appreciate something. Looking for the full Citizen version?

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in