* The dollar was broadly weaker today with the dollar index closing down .85 to 94.78 * At that time gold was up about $18; sliver up about .25 * Then all of a sudden New York Fed Chairman William Dudley in an interview on Fox Business basically said that a September rate hike was still possible * Look, a September alien invasion is still possible, but I'm not going to waste my time preparing for it * What's amazing to me is how all of the villagers still come running every time a Fed official cries "Wolf!" * Haven't they noticed that they've cried, "Wolf!" over and over again and there's never a wolf? * I think that Dudley purposely came out and mentioned a September rate increase just to keep the markets in check; to preserve the false narrative that there is actually a recovery, instead of a bubble * All of a sudden, gold sold off, it went from +$18 to +$2 or $3 * Silver went negative; it lost its entire rally in a matter of minutes * I think Dudley was trying to undo the damage done overnight by Dudley's counterpart at the San Francisco Fed, John Williams' well-thought out paper * Williams wrote in his piece that he believes we're in a "new era". He doesn't understand that the new era that we're in is collateral damage from central bank monetary policy * They think this is a random occurrence that needs a new government prescription * John Williams is proposing, based on this "new normal" the neutral interest rate is so low, it's almost impossible for the central banks to get there, absent negative interest rates * What Williams is proposing, is more inflation * What he is arguing is that we should scrap this 2% inflation target and that we need a higher number * I've been saying for years that this is going to happen * It's just like the unemployment rate, where they said, "We'll raise interest rates if it gets below 6.5% and then we let it go below 5% * We kept moving that goal post * I said the same thing was going to happen to inflation * In fact it is happening. If you look at the CPI numbers that just came out today, we continue to be above the 2% level on the core; we've been there for many months in a row * Now they're already starting to say, "Hey wait a minute, 2% isn't high enough * We need more inflation because we need lower rates, and the only way to get there is to have higher inflation * This is what I have been expecting * If you read William's piece, he says one of the ways we should get there is for the Fed to target nominal GDP * In other words, not GDP after you adjust for inflation * I've argued that the deflator is under the actual inflation number, therefore overestimating GDP growth * The Fed is saying, "Who cares about the GDP deflator? * All we care about is the nominal number * We don't care if the growth is real or inflationary, we just want nominal GDP numbers to go up" * What good is that? * No one benefits from phony GDP growth that is simply a by-product of inflation * The whole point is that we want the economy to actually, grow, not for just prices to go up * But what the Williams is saying is no, all we care about is prices going up * It's all about style over substance * That's why we're stuck in this malaise * Additionally, what Williams was also arguing for was more fiscal stimulus * He was saying that we're at the end of our rope with interest rates at practically at zero * We need the government to provide more stimulus in the form of deficit spending * We've already got about a $20 trillion national debt * If deficit spending were stimulative, why haven't we gotten a huge stimulus from that $20 trillion of debt? Our Sponsors:* Check out Infinite Epigenetics: https://infiniteepigenetics.com/GOLD* Check out Justin Wine and use my code SCHIFF20 for a great deal: https://www.justinwine.comPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related