* Earlier today Janet Yellen delivered her much-anticipated and way over-hyped speech at the annual Jackson Hole Symposium * It wasn't as irrelevant as I thought it was going to be, but the actual relevant part of the speech was lost on just about everybody * Instead they keep focusing on whether or not the Fed is going to raise rates by another .25 in September or December or maybe both * In reality, whether they do or do not is irrelevant, given the nature of where we are and where the U.S. economy actually is * For a small person, Janet Yellen certainly casts a large shadow over the financial markets * Everybody was on pins and needles, all the traders were there with their fingers on the buttons waiting to react to anything that Yellen said * I mentioned on an earlier podcast that there had already been a sell-off on gold stocks a couple of days ago on the anticipation of Yellen's hawkish comments * The rest of the market seemed to ignore the possibility that Yellen would be a hawk * Before I discuss what she said, I want to examine whether anyone on the committee could be considered a hawk * A hawk is predatory; is to be feared, reflecting a tough central banker who believes in sound money * On the other hand, a dove is cute and fluff; doesn't really hurt anybody * A dove wants cheap money - keep interests low so as not to harm anybody - nothing to fear * When it comes to hawks with respect to the Federal Reserve, the bird is extinct * They are all doves and the only difference is the degree of dovishness * The hawks are gone and are probably never coming back * Yellen was not a hawk, and neither was Stan FischerOur Sponsors:* Check out Infinite Epigenetics: https://infiniteepigenetics.com/GOLD* Check out Justin Wine and use my code SCHIFF20 for a great deal: https://www.justinwine.comPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related