Did the Twins have an obligation to change the roster more after losing 103 games? (ep. 102)

episode

The SKOR North Twins Show | a Minnesota Twins podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

Armchair Anonymous: Bad Customer 54 min · 25 Sep 2026 · Armchair Expert with Dax Shepard

Headlines: Car crash kills junior police officer 4 min · 25 Sep 2026 · The Daily Aus

Day 268: Rebuilding the Temple (2026) 29 min · 25 Sep 2026 · The Bible in a Year (with Fr. Mike Schmitz)

NPR News: 09-25-2026 3AM EDT 5 min · 25 Sep 2026 · NPR News Now

ADHD Expert: Why You Feel Motivated But Can't Do Anything 1h 9m · 25 Sep 2026 · The Jefferson Fisher Podcast

3AM ET 09/25/2026 Newscast 3 min · 25 Sep 2026 · Fox News Hourly Update

Report any issue

Source

Recorded17 Jan 2017

Publisherrss.art19.com

Handlerec:14151523

Show notes

The Twins lost 103 games last year. And now their projected opening day lineup looks about the same. It feels stale. Whats up with that? Phil Mackey and Derek Wetmore ask whether the Twins should have gone with more sweeping changes after a disastrous 2016 season. Should they have overhauled the roster? Did they need more changes in the front office?Does marketing matter? Whats the goal short term and long term?See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in