What Comes After Murthy v Missouri

episode

The Tech Policy Press Podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

#502 – Psychiatry, Insane Asylums, Mental Illness, ECT, Lobotomies, Freud & Jung 3h 43m · 17 Sep 2026 · Lex Fridman Podcast

Your partner wants profit. You want freedom. Now what? 22 min · 16 Sep 2026 · The Optometry Success Podcast

Board of County Supervisors Meeting - Work Session - Sep 15, 2026 3h 17m · 15 Sep 2026 · Prince William County Board of Supervisors

Finance and Budget Committee - Sep 15, 2026 1h 43m · 15 Sep 2026 · Prince William County Finance and Budget Committee

Sept. 15, 2026 Board of Supervisors Meeting 8h 46m · 15 Sep 2026 · Fairfax County Board of Supervisors

The Art of True Happiness | Dr. Arthur Brooks 2h 49m · 14 Sep 2026 · Huberman Lab

Report any issue

Source

Recorded14 Jul 2024

Publisherfeeds.captivate.fm ↗

Handlerec:7859886

Show notes

On June 26, the US Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in Murthy v Missouri, a cased that considered whether the Biden administration violated the First Amendment in its efforts to address COVID-19 mis- and disinformation on social media. Tech Policy press fellow Dean Jackson, who studied the case closely, discussed the outcome and what it means for the future with three experts:Olga Belogolova, director of the Emerging Technologies Initiative at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS);Mayze Teitler, a legal fellow at the Knight First Amendment Institute; andNina Jankowicz, co-Founder and CEO of the American Sunlight Project.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in