To Hearing, Or Not To Hearing? That is the Question...

episode

The Title IX and Civil Rights Podcast not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

Bringing Kashmir’s lakes back to life 25 min · 23 Sep 2026 · The Documentary Podcast

Soup 56 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Three Bean Salad

AFL Record Editor Ash Browne | Grand Final edition on sale now! (23.09.26) 2 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Whateley

NPR News: 09-22-2026 8PM EDT 4 min · 23 Sep 2026 · NPR News Now

Send Me To Sleep | Aristotle 44 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Send Me To Sleep

Finding the balance between offence & defence | The Art of Coaching with Ken Hinkley! (23.09.26) 5 min · 23 Sep 2026 · Whateley

Report any issue

Source

Recorded30 May 2024

Publisherrss.libsyn.com ↗

Handlerec:10908996

Show notes

Dan Schorr and Alyssa-Rae McGinn discuss the new Title IX regulations and the challenging choices that institutions must now make regarding how to structure their Title IX adjudication processes. Should we maintain live hearings? If so, should advisors conduct live cross-examination or submit questions to the hearing officer? If hearings are removed, how do we remain compliant with new laws and regulations, while preserving due process protections and support for all parties? (Episode 125)

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in