Show notes
TPI Composites sells its automotive business, Fortescue invests in Nabrawind's innovative wind turbine technology, LiftWerx receives a majority equity investment from TowerBrook Capital Partners, and Denmark's Export and Investment Fund supports Vestas' involvement in Australia's Golden Plains Wind Farm.
Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly email update on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard's StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary Barnes' YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!
Pardalote Consulting - https://www.pardaloteconsulting.comWeather Guard Lightning Tech - www.weatherguardwind.comIntelstor - https://www.intelstor.com
Allen Hall: I'm Allen Hall, president of Weather Guard Lightning Tech, and I'm here with the founder and CEO of IntelStor, Phil Totaro, and the chief commercial officer of Weather Guard, Joel Saxum, and this is your NewsFlash. Newsflash is brought to you by our friends at IntelStor. If you want market intelligence that generates revenue, then book a demonstration of IntelStor at intelstor.com.
TPI Composites has decided to sell its automotive business unit to investment firm, Clear Creek Investments. This divestiture aligns with TPI's strategy to focus on its core wind energy business. The sale is expected to improve TPI's monthly cash flow by about 1. 7 million over the remainder of 2024.
TPI composites accounted for around 33 percent of all onshore wind blades on a megawatt basis globally, excluding China. Now, Phil, it does seem like wind energy companies that have been dabbling in associated industries are trying to get back out of them.
Philip Totaro: To a certain extent, yes. It's, it's interesting because we go through these periods where companies like to be able to vertically integrate in any one industry vertical or, or potentially dabble in, in others.
But the timing of this is interesting in the context of. TPI wants to be able to strengthen their position and their relationship with GE, who obviously is going through, some tumult with LM wind power as they kind of right size that, that company. TPI doesn't want to lose GE's business because they're, quite highly dependent on it.
And with the rise of kind of Chinese wind turbine manufacture, blade manufacturers, they have increased competition. In the world for blade manufacturing that they didn't have, even going back a few years, so divesting the automotive business segment is fascinating that it's going to leave them to focus on the core wind energy segment.
It hasn't been, the best of times for them recently, but hopefully this allows them to continue. Growing their, their footprint in within the industry and throughout the rest of the world.
Joel Saxum: I see this as a gamble, right? Because a lot of times if you are very dependent on one revenue stream, i.
e. TPI, building blades, If you have another, and that building with that being tumultuous, right? There's contracts come up, they come down, there's TPI, there's blade issues, you gotta have warranty claims, all these different things. So that's a pretty, kind of a risky business model. If you have another thing it's just like diversifying your portfolio, right?
If you have another entity or another silo that makes money, Or is, is doing decent and supporting, I think, I would think you'd keep it at this point in time to be able to kind of like flatten out your revenues. Now, if you're a company that's a a large entity where you're like a, and I'm, I know they're connected business wise, but I'm saying just GE as example where aerospace and health and all these different things.
Yeah, at that point in time, it makes sense to silo off some things and focus in. But if it's TPI and you're just doing blades and then a little bit of automotive, I would think you'd keep it to be able to kind of, bolster your revenue base, but going a different direction. There's going switching to just blade.
Philip Totaro: So, and keep in mind, this could be because they're pursuing a deal with somebody and the deal they're pursuing somebody saying, get rid of this automotive business because we don't want it. If we're going to acquire you or otherwise partner with you. So that could be driving it as well.
Allen Hall: Australian mining and green energy company Fortescue has made an additional equity investment into Spanish wind turbine innovator Nabrawind.
The investment aims to accelerate the commercialization of Nabrawind's innovative products such as modular blades craneless blade installation systems and self erecting towers and the partnership between Fortescue and Nabrawind, which began in 2023, focuses on addressing challenges in onshore wind installations related to logistics and project delays.
Now, Phil, we have seen a number of concepts and early adaptations of turbine erecting equipment. Why is Fortescue investing in Nabrawind at this point and where does that push Nabrawind?
Philip Totaro: Hmm. Yeah, this is a really interesting kind of evolution of Nabrawind's journey so far. Thank you. Whereas they've been regionally focused in Spain and, and also North Africa recently with some of the demonstrations that they've done.
This really, they, they've also worked a little bit in China with some companies to try and bolster their position there. Through some technology and IP licensing, but the reason why Fortescue wants this now is Fortescue's different business units, including Squadron Energy Wind Lab which are kind of merging together they want to be able to develop projects in remote locations in Australia where they aren't going to be able to truck components out there very conveniently.
And so having something that could do self erection on the tower and or the blades would be desirable. So that's kind of the first bit, coupled with the fact that Forescue is building some of these mega projects that are, 10 gigawatts, 20, 30 gigawatts in size, and they want to use, megawatt onshore wind turbines.
And so with that in mind as well, they want to have technology that's going to allow them to be able to do that. You, if you know anything about the logistics kind of situation for the existing. tower manufacturers in Australia, they can't get a lot of their towers trucked to the places where they need to go because they just don't have the physical infrastructure in Australia to be able to do it.
So having, this kind of self erecting technology comes in handy in, in that use case. Now that said this is pretty much it. Putting a lot of eggs in, in one basket at this point with a technology that's, gone through. I mean, it's been in development for almost 10 years now and it's gone through a fair amount of, of technological diligence and whatnot.
But it hasn't actually really been. Kind of deployed at scale yet. So we have yet to see whether or not this is going to be a useful capability or not to me.
Joel Saxum: This one is reminiscent of the oil business. Okay. So when oil companies, oil majors, specifically ones with really deep pockets, see the need for technology, whether it's an offshore platform, subsea drilling, like the really difficult stuff.
They invest in and or provide capital to smaller innovation and technology groups to develop it for them simply because building, doing that stuff internally is very tough, right? If you're a, let's take it for example, if you're a Chevron, it's a lot harder to build up an innovation department with a bunch of smart engineers and fund it and do all this stuff rather than an engineering group coming to the team and saying, Hey, we have a need for.
Product XYZ, find us someone to build it, and then someone might have a sponsor, and they grab the cash, they give it to them, they build it, and they deliver it to them. That's a model that's used in the oil and gas business regularly, and this is reminiscent of it. The guys, the Squadron Energy team that's gonna build, wants to build all these massive wind farms in Western Australia, they see a need for some, some new technology and they're not going to develop it themselves.
So they just grab the capital, give it to someone that will, and reap the benefits.
Allen Hall: Tower Brook Capital Partners has made a majority equity investment in Canada based LiftWerx. LiftWerx has developed proprietary up tower crane technology for turbine servicing. Their innovative solutions are seen as faster, cheaper, safer, and more environmentally friendly compared to existing alternatives.
This marks the third investment for Towerbrook's impact strategy, Towerbrook Delta, launched last year. So LiftWerx has been making rapid improvements and getting out to a number of sites in Canada and the United States. We recently had them near a wind farm in Massachusetts near me. And it, the, the adaptation of that, the adoption rate of LiftWerx is astoundingly fast.
Which means they need cash, right, though?
Philip Totaro: Absolutely. And keep in mind, my understanding is that their kind of crane less or onboard crane technologies, avoiding the, the big crane callout, shall we say that lets you fix components up to about a three megawatt turbine size, I think? So they, what, what that facilitates is, as kind of average turbine sizes have, have grown and, and their technology is also gotten better, it's seeing more widespread adoption because we, we know, from discussions we've had on the show before as well, that, Faults and failures are kind of increasing, particularly things that require either a large component swap out, like a blade or a gearbox, maybe an uptower converter or something.