Send us a textCover Photo of David Newhoff by Sean MekasTo learn more, please visit Mr. Newhoff's site as well as his blog, The Illusion of More.Show Notes:1:45 Newhoff’s background 4:15 impetus to write Who Invented Oscar Wilde?: The Photograph at the Center of Modern American Copyright? 6:15 SCOTUS’s Warhol decision10:00 Sarony’s input compared with and AI users’ input14:00 Newhoff’s comments to USCO’s NOI and Request for Comments17:20 compulsory licensing scheme18:50 RightsClick25:45 USCO’s focus on how a work was created (by AI or human) versus leaving that to courts25:55 feedback on his comments to USCO32:00 AI copyright lawsuits in the US36:25 liability for AI training data40:45 Emily Gould: whether training involves making copies, EU exception for copies43:00 whether US copyright is still fit for purpose in light of issues raised by AI44:20 work “in the style of” 48:40 Deborah Roberts vs Lynthia Edwards - suit over collage works52:30 Alan Robertshaw: threshold of infringing work versus transformative work54:50 why use AI to create artwork56:45 NFT hype57:35 the legacy Newhoff hopes to be creating 58:50 Newhoff’s view of justice 1:01:00 status of Allen v. Cooper and Allen’s pending constitutional takings claim1:04:00 camouflage patents1:05:20 change from allowing IP claims against states to decision that Congress does not have that authority and 11th Amendment’s restriction of individuals bringing suit against states controlled Please share your comments and/or questions at [email protected] by Toulme.To hear more episodes, please visit Warfare of Art and Law podcast's website.To leave questions or comments about this or other episodes of the podcast and/or for information about joining the 2ND Saturday discussion on art, culture and justice, please message me at [email protected]. Thanks so much for listening!© Stephanie Drawdy [2025]

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related