Welcome to Episode 5 of UPC UNFILTERED—your concise, AI-powered guide to the latest Unified Patent Court decisions.Based on Professor Willem Hoyng’s authoritative analysis, this week’s episode covers highlights from Week 16 of 2025, including:• Syngenta v Sumi Agro (UPC_CFI_566/2024; 39/2025): LD Munich allows claim change to include non-UPC EPC states post–BSH v Electrolux.• Kunststoff Nehl v Häfele (UPC_CFI_526/2024): 80 auxiliary requests cut to 10—a clear message on procedural economy.• Seoul Viosys v Expert Klein (UPC_CFI_363/2023; 677/2024): Claim dismissed for being one day late—strict deadlines strictly enforced.• Bekaert v Siltronic (UPC_CFI_539/2024): Evidentiary seizure upheld—broad powers under R. 196 RoP confirmed.• Emboline v AorticLab (UPC_CFI_628/2024): Full security for costs imposed on counterclaim—access-to-justice concerns raised.While our voices are digital, our insights are real. Still, some details may occasionally be slightly off—and names may be butchered.Prefer to read the full written version? Access the complete commentary here:https://www.hoyngrokhmonegier.com/news-insights/upc-unfiltered-by-willem-hoyng-upc-decisions-week-16-2025/Brought to you by HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER — we do IP.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related