1DCA Division 3 Oral Argument - 2025/09/24 - Sep 24, 2025

argument

1DCA Division 3 Oral Argument - 2025/09/24

California First District Court of Appeal 1h 34m 4 chapters transcribed 7 days ago official recording ↗

▲ 0

Transcript

jump: chapters · find in transcript

Transcript

Transcript generated automatically by AI and may contain errors.

What is the opening procedure and who are the parties in the Division 3 oral argument?

Unknown 0:14

Good morning, welcome. Please be seated.

Unknown 0:23

Thank you to those in the courtroom for braiding the fire drill we had this morning. And welcome everyone to this oral argument of Division Three of the First Appellate District. You see that with me on the bench this morning are my colleagues, Justice Karen Fujisaki and Justice Joanna Petru. We will have a panel change later in the morning. I believe the only uh argument on line one is remote, so I will now call line one. That's the matter of Lan Nguyen versus Ite Snof. May I have appearances please?

Lan Nguyen 0:59

May a torang guy who so smoke, like war language, singular, uh.

Unknown 1:09

Oh la langue written, language uh And then we um Lambda Lung Lambda Tokyo. Okay. Dois anos. Let's not

Lan Nguyen 1:26

Okay, my name is Lan Win, I am the the petitioner in this case, um that um file lawsuit against uh Island Snuff.

Unknown 1:38

Yes, thank you very much. May I also have the interpreter in uh introduce himself for the record.

Lan Nguyen 1:46

Good morning, Yona. This is Ryan Lee, the Vietnamese and Chatter.

Unknown 1:52

Thank you very much for being here. Uh Ms. Nguyen, the matter's down for ten minutes. The microphone is yours.

Lan Nguyen 1:59

Rabbi a toach muy foclan, me conoce uh beauty.

Unknown 2:06

Yeah. Kekko doubt.

Unknown 2:16

Ma chain ka build he dang yeah, kingway kingway chat la dun la um toa the equip the Kijking of Kai. Well, okay, um Oye, cae eso. You ka u kota o chamkang da. Lato iukta chongking aye chamkang ay hitzi and chom kit twa. Superior cort. This one you have to s you have to stop so that we can h get an interpretation.

Lan Nguyen 2:57

Um so Your Honor, um I appeared in court previously at um Napa County, Superior Court, uh along with the respondent in this case. But I I don't I don't think the respondent um did what he or she was supposed to do based on what the court asked uh the respondent to do.

Unknown 3:23

But Chung King I Mato Diza to So uh uh uh superior court. T good da kom ja toy. Noi uh no y tungjet van. Ketchanyak Vaben Getachaka ben Dolphung. Um Munchitola moi tongs it that some may die. Um va on ta chava koa kangi. Lamgu nyo chung chung king etan la.

Lan Nguyen 4:06

Okay, and also on the same uh court date at at the Supreme Court. I I was provided with a with a Vietnamese interpreter and um the the court allow the other party to curse me that I was stupid because I needed an an interpreter and the the respondent doesn't do didn't need one.

How does Lan Nguyen introduce the case and request a continuance?

Lan Nguyen 4:31

and also allow um the respondent's wife to take the witness stance. Even though she's also um she she's the wife of the respondent, so I don't know how the court allowed her to be the to be the witness.

Unknown 4:47

So sin lo adn toy sindu a uh nin ching, la toada kong chatongui tongues at vein. My la uh chang it tongue tongue j bean. Da but to hide on la toy sin that don't to tung chu la sindup. Zhai can I uh can I so I my home sound that to both soon team my um To knock down heads on it. Wellton Chuckland m mucham n mocham hai met uhlight exhibit was seen uh nya pai nya patching up lamot la vi nya toyti bi umet batoy bi uh B. Um Don't hide.

Lan Nguyen 5:35

Oh, come on, go. Okay, uh I'm sorry, I just want to clarify that I wasn't provided with a Vietnamese interpreter at the court hearing. Um, but also last week I um put in a request to the court for a continuance of ten days. So instead of today for the oral argument, I I asked for a continuance of ten days so I have more time to prepare other documents needed. That includes 120 pages and three exhibits to show the damage um the sustained to my property. as well as the harm that I had to suffer.

Unknown 6:18

So Ms. Nguyen, We sent you a tentative opinion explaining why we think based on the papers you submitted. That we should affirm The trial court's decision not to enter a restraining order. At this point we're not going to be granting a continuance. We need you to focus on the question of whether there's anything in our tentative opinion. That you Want to respond to for the court here today.

Lan Nguyen 7:01

La Uh Pazekum Gulam Teuke Mukumamu, Tukla Paz, Down S Lanthoka y Mata Yud, Tukla Kum Jofe, Klant Com to eat, the Bangra.

Unknown 7:33

The um To Sinding Cheng La Kengai Mato Bei. Kate, that to sin lazoi la mouingai, sinzo la mouengai, okay, uh get on eye. Bang a y ba tobe in yunking na pa superior court.