Section 13
authority
3 mentions
2 recordings
first heard Apr 2017
last heard Jan 2021
±0 vs the 6 months before
Statutory provision authorizing injunctions (Section 13)
Trend
No mentions in the last 6M.Widen the range to see when Section 13 was said.
Moments
newest first · ▶ plays the momentUnknownSupreme Court of the United States · AMG Capital Management, LLC v. FTC (19-508) · 1:04:40 · Jan 2021
…Well, of course it's going to be more attractive for the Commission to proceed under Section 13 and Section 19, where it doesn't have to comply with, for example, the heightened proof requirement, where it doesn't have to comply with the limitations period.…
UnknownSupreme Court of the United States · California Public Employees' Retirement System v. ANZ Securi... · 55:27 · Apr 2017
…Section 13 is a statute of repose.…
UnknownSupreme Court of the United States · California Public Employees' Retirement System v. ANZ Securi... · 50:34 · Apr 2017
…I don't want to get into a debate about what question presented one has and question presented two is, but it's worth remembering that even if you somehow think you can maybe interpret Section 13 to encompass this theory...…
All 3 moments