Stolt Nielsen
authority
5 mentions
3 recordings
first heard Mar 2013
last heard 10 Feb
↑1 vs the 12 months before
Case law holding that fraud allegations are not considered at the first prong of anti‑slap analysis
Trend
Peak in the week of 5 Feb — 1 mentions across 1 series.
Moments
newest first · ▶ plays the momentMaurice BambuCalifornia Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division One · 4DCA Division 1 Oral Argument - 2026/02/10 - Feb 10, 2026 · 2:02:37 · 10 Feb
…And and I do believe that the Supreme Court's decision in Stolt Nielsen for for example, uh does provide an avenue for this court to vacate the arbitration award because the Supreme Court's decision is is consistent with California's uh statute uh uh uh twelve eighty six point two, which lays out those two uh…
Frank VarellaSupreme Court of the United States · Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela (17-988) · 48:32 · Oct 2018
…Well, first of all, in Stolt Nelson they did not interpret the agreement's language at all.…
UnknownSupreme Court of the United States · Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela (17-988) · 0:34 · Oct 2018
…The court made that clear in Stolt Nielsen, where it said a party may not be compelled under the FAA to submit to class arbitration unless there is a contractual basis for concluding that the party agreed to do so.…
5 moments · sign in to read them all