Title 17

authority
8 mentions 2 recordings first heard Nov 2025 last heard 11 Mar ↓8 vs the 6 months before

Statutory provision governing DMV testing procedures

Trend

mentions per week · public audio 7d30d6M12M
No mentions in the last 6M.Widen the range to see when Title 17 was said.

Moments

newest first · ▶ plays the moment
California Fifth District Court of Appeal5DCA Oral Argument - 2026/03/11 - Mar 11, 2026 · 5:10:24 · 11 Mar
…It it's the motorist's burden to uh present a violation of title seventeen that bears on the reliability of the test result.…
· Open transcript →
California Fifth District Court of Appeal5DCA Oral Argument - 2026/03/11 - Mar 11, 2026 · 5:09:24 · 11 Mar
…I think it would play a factor, uh, because the Title seventeen require requires continuous observation for fifteen minutes to ensure that the motorist is not uh regurgitating, vomiting, or any of that.…
· Open transcript →
Kaye LivelyCalifornia Fifth District Court of Appeal · 5DCA Oral Argument - 2025/11/18 - Nov 18, 2025 · 1:24:35 · 18 Nov
…Because there is no showing of a violation of Title 17, Title 17 was complied with, that presumption is not disturbed, and the breath test results that were gathered and submitted as evidence are considered reliable.…
· Open transcript →
Kaye LivelyCalifornia Fifth District Court of Appeal · 5DCA Oral Argument - 2025/11/18 - Nov 18, 2025 · 1:24:28 · 18 Nov
…in order to disturb the presumption that Title 17 was……
Kaye LivelyCalifornia Fifth District Court of Appeal · 5DCA Oral Argument - 2025/11/18 - Nov 18, 2025 · 1:24:25 · 18 Nov
…And it's that violation of Title 17 that we need……
Kaye LivelyCalifornia Fifth District Court of Appeal · 5DCA Oral Argument - 2025/11/18 - Nov 18, 2025 · 1:22:08 · 18 Nov
…The officer complied with the letter of Title 17, which……
Kaye LivelyCalifornia Fifth District Court of Appeal · 5DCA Oral Argument - 2025/11/18 - Nov 18, 2025 · 1:22:04 · 18 Nov
…Here, there is no substantive affirmative evidence that there was……
8 moments · sign in to read them all