Aaron Siri
speaker
358 appearances
2 recordings
2 series
first heard Nov 2024
last heard Dec 2024
Aaron Siri’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
I would say they accused us of trying to eliminate the polio vaccine.
The New York Times headline was, right, that it was filed to get rid of the polio vaccine. That was the headline that everybody picked it up.
It's a classic retort. If you question anything about the safety of these products or even their efficacy or the clinical trials or the postalizer safety, the typical retort is, so you want everybody to have polio, huh?
It's a product. We're just asking questions.
So the, what the New York Times did is they purposefully, knowingly misled the entire country into believing that a petition that I filed on behalf of a client, not my petition, my client's petition, not Mr. Kennedy, he was not the client, a petition I've never spoke to him about ever, nor did my client. sought to eliminate the polio vaccine. That was the headline.
And therefore, because I'm Mr. Kennedy's lawyer, in some instances, my firm has almost 80 people. We have lots of clients, including Mr. Kennedy, including many others. And because we filed this petition on behalf of a different client, nothing to do with him. that questioned one polio vaccine, by the way, and it's licensure, and only us the children will get into that.
Somehow he wants to get rid of the polio vaccine, and they knew it was untrue, and they published it for the following simple reason. First of all, and if they didn't know this, they're not fit to be a high school newspaper, okay? One, the petition only sought review, and this was a petition to the FDA, only sought review as to one of six licensed polio vaccines and only as to children. Why?
What was the basis of the petition? Which by the way, should have been the headline. This particular polio vaccine licensed in 1990, not the Salk vaccine, it's not the Sabin vaccine, it's not the vaccine that you think of when you hear the polio vaccine, okay? This vaccine was based on a novel technology You need to grow a virus in some kind of cultural medium.
Here, they use something called Vero cells. These are chromosomally modified monkey kidney cells that are rendered immortal, just like cancer cells. That means they'll grow forever, just like cancer cells. And they end up as an ingredient in every single vial.
The clinical trial relied upon to license this brand new novel polio vaccine in 1990, reviewed safety for literally three days after injection, three days. That sounds incredible. That sounds like it cannot be true. but it is on the FDA website. On behalf of my client, we FOIA the FDA for all the clinical trial reports for the summary basis of approval.
We tortured them for years, basically saying, come on, there's gotta be more than this. You license it based on three days of safety review. in the clinical trial after injection with no control group. There's no way you could know the safety of this product before you licensed it to be injected.
because you need a baseline what do you compare it to the best you could do is compare it to the background rate which is almost impossible because then you'd have to figure out the background rate for that exact demographic it essentially renders the trial useless for safety but here's the thing even if they had a control group tucker even if they did with three days of safety review what what are you reviewing
It takes weeks often for even any immune dysregulation caused by the product to appear, just like it takes at least many weeks for you to build up, let's say, antibodies to the target antigen in the vial. If you're gonna have self-attacking antibodies, those take weeks as well to develop. And oftentimes when you're giving it to a baby, this product is given at two, four, and six months.
If they're going to have an immune dysregulation, if they're going to have a developmental issue, you're not going to know that for years. Asthma is not even diagnosed until a few years of age. Developmental issues take years. And so, you know, a lot of the issues that we see, I mentioned, you know, my firm's got about 40 people that just do vaccine work.
We do other things, but they just do vaccine work. And we don't represent pharmaceutical companies. So as far as I know, we have the biggest...
vaccine practice in the world that doesn't represent pharmaceutical companies one of the practices we have is vaccine injury claims we don't see pharmaceutical companies you can't they have immunity to liability since 1986 the only product like that but you can't see the federal health authorities in this little program and so you know are a lot of the injuries that we see when we do that work are immune or immune mediated neurological disorders
And those things are not going to appear until typically a few days after vaccination. So this trial, going back to this polio vaccine that was the subject of this petition, it was utterly useless to determine its safety.
You know, that's an excellent question. Why would the FDA agree to license it, right? It's a great question. We could talk about regulatory capture. We could talk about the ideological beliefs that the folks who are involved in CBER, which is the biologics division of the FDA. And within that, there's an office called the OVVR. That's where the vaccines are actually, licenses are reviewed.
And I've met some of the folks who've been in that department, and they're very much I don't know if the right, I guess, ideologues, they believe almost a priority in the safety of these products, even when they're experimental to such a degree that I guess they let products like this. And I should tell you, if you think that
I'm speculating, right? The important point is they did it. Why they did it, we could speculate on, but they did it.
Showing 1–20 of 358 · page 1 of 18
Next →