Aaron Siri

So we use the same document on behalf of ICANN and we filed on it and we said, hey, we want you to take this action, but we have to ask them to change some action the FDA took. Well, the only action they took was to license it. So the valve to ask them to get them to require a new trial is to say, pause or pull the licensure for this one product until there's a proper trial, okay?

So we use the same document on behalf of ICANN and we filed on it and we said, hey, we want you to take this action, but we have to ask them to change some action the FDA took. Well, the only action they took was to license it. So the valve to ask them to get them to require a new trial is to say, pause or pull the licensure for this one product until there's a proper trial, okay?

It was the legal mechanism to get another trial. The purpose wasn't to get rid of the vaccine. The purpose was to get them to do a proper trial. And in no universe, to be clear, did we ever think... my client ever think, and I ever think, that the FDA would actually pull the licensure. We just hoped, thought, they'd say, hey, go do a proper clinical trial. They're onto us.

It was the legal mechanism to get another trial. The purpose wasn't to get rid of the vaccine. The purpose was to get them to do a proper trial. And in no universe, to be clear, did we ever think... my client ever think, and I ever think, that the FDA would actually pull the licensure. We just hoped, thought, they'd say, hey, go do a proper clinical trial. They're onto us.

It was the legal mechanism to get another trial. The purpose wasn't to get rid of the vaccine. The purpose was to get them to do a proper trial. And in no universe, to be clear, did we ever think... my client ever think, and I ever think, that the FDA would actually pull the licensure. We just hoped, thought, they'd say, hey, go do a proper clinical trial. They're onto us.

It's now been, that petition was filed in 2022. It's been years. They haven't done it. And I like to make this point very clear, just super clear. I really got to set this record straight. It's so important. Even if this petition was granted, There is not a single child or adult in America that would not have had access to a polio vaccine. Not one.

It's now been, that petition was filed in 2022. It's been years. They haven't done it. And I like to make this point very clear, just super clear. I really got to set this record straight. It's so important. Even if this petition was granted, There is not a single child or adult in America that would not have had access to a polio vaccine. Not one.

It's now been, that petition was filed in 2022. It's been years. They haven't done it. And I like to make this point very clear, just super clear. I really got to set this record straight. It's so important. Even if this petition was granted, There is not a single child or adult in America that would not have had access to a polio vaccine. Not one.

That is what makes the New York Times headlines absolutely false. They knew it was false. They intended for the country to be deceived because they're trying desperately to derail Mr. Kennedy's nomination. And I'll just- But hold on.

That is what makes the New York Times headlines absolutely false. They knew it was false. They intended for the country to be deceived because they're trying desperately to derail Mr. Kennedy's nomination. And I'll just- But hold on.

That is what makes the New York Times headlines absolutely false. They knew it was false. They intended for the country to be deceived because they're trying desperately to derail Mr. Kennedy's nomination. And I'll just- But hold on.

Why is it so important?

Why is it so important?

Why is it so important?

i think it's probably a mix like many things in life of a number of factors um i think that it matters whether you're looking at the level of the two reporters that wrote this piece at the level of the new york times as an organization at the various people between those two reporters and new york times an organization that had some hand in that piece before it came out i think it's probably a blend of ranging from ideology you know the i will tell you these two authors of this article

i think it's probably a mix like many things in life of a number of factors um i think that it matters whether you're looking at the level of the two reporters that wrote this piece at the level of the new york times as an organization at the various people between those two reporters and new york times an organization that had some hand in that piece before it came out i think it's probably a blend of ranging from ideology you know the i will tell you these two authors of this article

i think it's probably a mix like many things in life of a number of factors um i think that it matters whether you're looking at the level of the two reporters that wrote this piece at the level of the new york times as an organization at the various people between those two reporters and new york times an organization that had some hand in that piece before it came out i think it's probably a blend of ranging from ideology you know the i will tell you these two authors of this article

I mean, they are in the category of what I would call vaccine zealots. I mean, they, I think, are incapable of objectively thinking and looking at this product. Do you remember their names? Their names are Cheryl and Christina, and I could pull it up if you'd like.

I mean, they are in the category of what I would call vaccine zealots. I mean, they, I think, are incapable of objectively thinking and looking at this product. Do you remember their names? Their names are Cheryl and Christina, and I could pull it up if you'd like.

I mean, they are in the category of what I would call vaccine zealots. I mean, they, I think, are incapable of objectively thinking and looking at this product. Do you remember their names? Their names are Cheryl and Christina, and I could pull it up if you'd like.