Andrew Dillon
speaker
367 appearances
3 recordings
1 series
first heard Aug 2026
last heard yesterday
Andrew Dillon’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 3 in all, peaking in Aug 2026 with 2.
Appearances
Well that will depend actually, Jared, depending on the re um the response from Geelong, how that how the pro how the process plays out from there.
So depending on the level of the sanction and where it might go, um we'll play through that.
But obviously given Craig's former role, he wouldn't be involved if it did go up to the Commission.
Look what we're looking at is the breaches in relation to the lodgment and that's important because that captures what's included in the agreement.
Well what we're looking at now is getting the information from Geelong and then we will see what we've got from there and then make a decision at that stage.
So we don't want to get ahead of I know people want answers really quickly and we're working on that, but we want to hear back from Geelong, give them the chance to reply to that and then we see where that goes.
Specific to the waiver, is it a breach of AFL rules?
It is well, if you look at it specifically and I think there's technically and again don't want to get ahead of where the um the sanction or the the rules might go, but anything that um looks to be inconsistent with the collective agreement, it would be have to be at least lodged with the AFL.
And Jolongov acknowledged that by saying not lodging it with the AFL and ultimately the AFL P P A being across it has been a you know a failure.
Had it been lodged
Would it have been rejected?
Well, I mean I I don't you can't sort of go into hypotheticals, but I I know what would have happened is that there would have been questions asked and the AFLPA would have been involved.
I know that for sure.
Do you think it was deliberately not lodged to avoid that scrutiny?
Again, I don't want to speculate I don't think so, but I mean we'll I don't want to but again, I don't want to get ahead of where we were.
I think what we'll do is hear from Geelong um in relation to um you know, we we know how the agreement was signed, it's just why the next
it wasn't taken and we'll hear from Geelong on that.
Again, I haven't spoken to um the player himself.
I spoke to his manager this morning, but his manager John Meeson at the moment and Peter Lenton who oversees that they weren't looking after Jake at that time.
I don't know whether it actually got to that level.
Showing 21–40 of 367 · page 2 of 19
← Previous
Next →