Andrew Wilson

But under a secular view, why do we need to have a domestic increased population anyway?

They can just import who they want.

And that's what they did in your country.

That's what they do in my country.

Unless you import so many of them that the original culture is replaced.

But then you can't argue against mass migration because what you're saying is just a tautology.

Because I got this from my ancestors, it's good.

What makes that good?

Because I got that from my ancestors.

Yeah, that's exactly what I'm saying.

And that's tautology.

So what you're doing is you're pointing to the identification of the thing as being the thing, right?

Which makes the thing the thing.

So then I say, well, mass migration is good.

Why is it good?

Well, because it's good.

And you'd probably say that's tautology if the point of something is to- Well, no, that, I mean, from, again, so now we're getting a worldview, right?

I totally agree with you.

The primary edict from an evolutionary standpoint is reproduction.

Right.