Andy Lowery

If you look at the facts and data and all the stuff we've done over the last couple of years, we've dispelled almost all of those worries and all of those risks.

And now it's a chance to just get some wartime kills, get it out there, get it in battle and put it to the test.

And if I'm wrong,

I'm wrong, but you're not gonna waste that much more money by everything you've done already so far, by getting it out there, getting it into the battlefield.

And I don't think that's a, hey, let's go challenge and do that.

It's like happening.

I mean, this war is driving us to that.

I don't know.

We've covered a lot.

Even...

Oh, one other thing that it advantages.

So we've talked about the collateral damage and it being a very safe system so you can use it in homeland, whereas kinetics you can't use in homeland in all situations without putting a lot of danger to houses and residential types of neighborhoods.

So kinetics don't make for a good solution for the homeland.

They make a good solution overseas in some cases, but the problem isn't just cost.

We talked a lot about cost, but it's also magazine depth.

And we only have a certain amount of missiles and a certain amount of production capacity to build new missiles.

And it's very difficult.

It's not like drones where you can just like, I think I read in something that China can make 30 million drones a year.

Wow.

There's nothing we can make 30 million of in a military lane, you know?