Arick Fudali
đ€ SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Of course, there's criminal accountability.
That would be ideal.
Civil accountability or even see you see some like societal accountability.
You have seen, you know, people lose their jobs, people resign, people sell their companies.
There's been some real, you know, what I call societal accountability.
they're really after criminal and civil liability.
Then the third is closure.
They'd really like to move on with their lives.
As much as they advocate and as much as they've been fighting and they're going to continue to fight to keep this topic in the news and keep it relevant to keep more pressure, they would like closure.
They'd like to move on for this.
They would like to be able to turn on their phones or their TVs and not see Jeffrey Epstein's face or name every single time and not that have to be their full identity anymore.
They'd like closure, but they cannot have closure without accountability and justice, and they can't have accountability and justice without exposure.
So it needs to be all three, and it needs to be in that order, exposure, accountability, and closure.
And I think that sums up really what this fight is all about for the survivors.
Thanks so much for having me.
I appreciate it.
We've been scrutinizing everything the DOJ has been doing for decades because it's important to remember that the DOJ, law enforcement, administration after administration absolutely failed the survivors going all the way back from the 90s. So in the 90s, of course, we've learned in the past
these past few document dumps that there was very credible reporting to the FBI about Jeffrey Epstein and what he was doing. And it appears from our research that the FBI didn't really do anything in response to very credible reporting, very credible complaint about Jeffrey Epstein's activities, which then resulted in allowing Jeffrey Epstein to continue to abuse
90-luvulta ja 2000-luvulta, eikÀ oikeastaan ollut mitÀÀn huolimatta tai todellista tutkimusta. HeidÀt on vaikuttanut kaikkien asioiden kohdalla. HeidÀn on ollut ennustettavaa ennustettavaa ennustettavaa ennustettavaa ennustettavaa ennustettavaa ennustettavaa ennustettavaa ennustettavaa ennustettavaa ennustettavaa ennustettavaa ennustettavaa ennustettavaa ennustettavaa
TÀmÀ on ongelma. Yhdysvallat, ei yllÀttÀen, tekevÀt lakia, jotka tekevÀt sen haastavaa, ettÀ yhdysvallat pysyvÀt. SiinÀ ei ole rauhaa. Joten kyllÀ, Yhdysvallat ja suurin piirtein lakiajÀrjestöt sekÀ kansainvÀliset ja kansainvÀliset entiteetkin ovat ymmÀrtÀneet Yhdysvallan, jossa he voivat vÀlttÀÀ lakia, vÀlttÀÀ liikkuvuutta nÀistÀ asioista. Toivottavasti se nÀyttÀÀ olevan sellaista, mitÀ olemme menossa tÀhÀn lakiaan, jota valitsimme viime aikoina.