Aubrey O'Day

speaker
1,063 appearances 30 recordings 2 series first heard Nov 2024 last heard Jun 2025

Aubrey O'Day’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months
No recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment
And I think that when you add them all up and, and they have, you know, people that are cooperating those stories that it's, it's just, it's out of the realm of anything that I could understand a man to be, you know, I just, I don't know many men that I don't know any men. Um, you know, I know some really bad, powerful people, but, uh,
To be aired out at this extent to this level, it's very bad behavior. To me, I'm a hard person to ask the words question to because I think words are man-made and they have the meaning that you allow them to have. So whether you say devil, God, king, or madman, whatever the words are, those are just descriptive words. To me, they're just...
Man-made words, they don't really hold any meaning other than what you give them. But that's not technically how the world chooses to see words. So that's more of my Bali alternative healing woo-woo side. Something only has the power that you allow it to have. But in this specific trial in court and with jurors, words absolutely matter. And those words are very damning.
If I ever met her, it would have been in passing. She seems to have been around during the time period that I was there. But like I said, the worlds were so separate in regards to, you know, Cassie wasn't in the studio making music. Like she said, her full-time job became something else. We were in the studio all day making music. We were around the Enterprise every day.
And then when we were taken out, we were with her in all of the social settings. They would have her around with us.
The first couple of words, I mean, I was laughing in my head thinking, have you seen Making the Band? But the last few statements, inebriated, not having any control.
I think even on a normal day, his energy is at a place that you could potentially gather the thought that he might be really high.
I didn't even know when we would get out of the studio at daddy's house out of the elevator and there would just be like a puff of white smoke and we couldn't figure out what direction to go in. I didn't even really understand what that was until it was explained to me and until I started feeling a little loopy. Like I said, we used to run to the staircase to get air.
Yeah, I mean, that did stand out to me. I was wondering. I could make tons of different assumptions. Somehow, it's likely protecting Cassie's secret or something, protecting her from him in some type of way that he found out. But that's just allegedly. I would have no idea. But also, I don't know what the situation was, because first she says it was a party, then she was sleeping in her bed.
I mean... What was it, girl? I need a picture. I was seeing a party at first and then apparently it's a sleep in bed. I don't know which story is true. And unfortunately, in a juror's mind, when they can't even place where the event started and they can't put a picture of how it all began.
and that's not even clear i don't know as a juror how how clear everything else could be for me if we couldn't even start off the setting of the situation and a big and a house party and sleeping in bed are two very different things and i think if you remember being hung off the balcony you probably remember if you were in bed sleeping or if it was a house party
No, you wouldn't forget being dangled. I think... I think that there's a possibility of that. Listen, we still have more cross left and we have a redirect. The redirect might be able to establish things a bit more clearer. Sometimes just being in, you know, it's a high pressure situation being on a stand. And these are incredible lawyers that are cross examining her.
So maybe just the pressure of that situation had her faltering. I don't know. But yeah. To me, when I look at any of these people, like, sorry, to roll back to what you asked me in the beginning, TJ, I took what I said to Homeland Security so seriously. If there were things that I saw, like, I witnessed a whole lot of things.
But unless I understood the beginning and end of how it happened or who was doing it or what this person said it was after the fact, I'm not going to offer up that type of information. Because that information is just not valuable because it could be shred apart as too inconsistent. There were things that I told them, hey, I saw this, I saw that.
But if I was to get crossed and cross was to ask me, are you sure it wasn't a facelift or a nose job? I'd have to say that could be a possibility. And I don't think maybe just people don't understand to be that clear. And because I grew up around lawyers, I knew to be. But I just I didn't offer anything that I couldn't factually prove that I didn't.
I like always at least two people that can corroborate a story. I make sure even in life when I go through something very hectic or something that I think is unethical in any workplace, I will document it immediately to a friend through phone call, through text.
And even if I can record, if it's in a one-party consent record state, I will start recording immediately just to make sure that I've got the receipts to prove what I'm talking about. Because when we get to levels like these, inconsistencies can lose a case and it can send somebody free that... potentially could be very dangerous.
So far, as of now, defense serious when they made some serious points on her prosecution, probably regrets putting her on the stand. I just don't think it was necessary. I think they're overshooting. With certain people, I think they're just overshooting it a bit. And that's a very risky game to play against lawyers that are very good.
And another thing that I'm concerned about is after she's finished with redirect today, I believe we're going to have... I believe that we're going to have the final Jane speaking. And from what I hear, it will take maybe five to six days. And then they're done with presenting their case, which means, sadly, I don't think we're seeing a KK and I don't think we're seeing a bodyguard.
And of all the things that that I have been able to understand throughout my time being like, you know, I said, I'm a self-acclaimed attorney, investigator, journalist for the past two years. I have spent a lot of time.
Showing 61–80 of 1,063 · page 4 of 54 ← Previous Next →