Candace Owens

But he's going to leave it because it would look ridiculous if they completely amended their complaints. It would essentially just be a major win for the Baldoni team to trump it. So instead, what they're doing is they're saying, well, we still have it in the 11 other claims, but it's irrelevant. They can't win it.

But he's going to leave it because it would look ridiculous if they completely amended their complaints. It would essentially just be a major win for the Baldoni team to trump it. So instead, what they're doing is they're saying, well, we still have it in the 11 other claims, but it's irrelevant. They can't win it.

But the other claims hold other allegations that they could, in theory, still win damages on. So let me be super clear on what I'm saying, because I can just show you so that it makes more sense. Just looking at this first cause of action. Ready? It's for sexual harassment in violation of Title VII, like we said. So Blake's team, if you look at 234, .234 here.

But the other claims hold other allegations that they could, in theory, still win damages on. So let me be super clear on what I'm saying, because I can just show you so that it makes more sense. Just looking at this first cause of action. Ready? It's for sexual harassment in violation of Title VII, like we said. So Blake's team, if you look at 234, .234 here.

But the other claims hold other allegations that they could, in theory, still win damages on. So let me be super clear on what I'm saying, because I can just show you so that it makes more sense. Just looking at this first cause of action. Ready? It's for sexual harassment in violation of Title VII, like we said. So Blake's team, if you look at 234, .234 here.

Sie sagen, sie wissen, dass sie das nicht gewinnen können. But that's not the only claim they're making. Go down to 236. In 236 it says that defendants of It Ends With Us Movie, LLC and Wayfarer intentionally violated Ms. Lively's rights under Title VII with malice or reckless indifference and as a result are liable for punitive damages.

Sie sagen, sie wissen, dass sie das nicht gewinnen können. But that's not the only claim they're making. Go down to 236. In 236 it says that defendants of It Ends With Us Movie, LLC and Wayfarer intentionally violated Ms. Lively's rights under Title VII with malice or reckless indifference and as a result are liable for punitive damages.

Sie sagen, sie wissen, dass sie das nicht gewinnen können. But that's not the only claim they're making. Go down to 236. In 236 it says that defendants of It Ends With Us Movie, LLC and Wayfarer intentionally violated Ms. Lively's rights under Title VII with malice or reckless indifference and as a result are liable for punitive damages.

So that's a separate claim and they're saying we can get punitive damages under this claim Even though we're likely not going to win 234. So they're just trying to save face here publicly by not butchering the entire lawsuit. But this is a major, major loss. In fact, if I'm looking at this, I'm going, what's actually left of this lawsuit?

So that's a separate claim and they're saying we can get punitive damages under this claim Even though we're likely not going to win 234. So they're just trying to save face here publicly by not butchering the entire lawsuit. But this is a major, major loss. In fact, if I'm looking at this, I'm going, what's actually left of this lawsuit?

So that's a separate claim and they're saying we can get punitive damages under this claim Even though we're likely not going to win 234. So they're just trying to save face here publicly by not butchering the entire lawsuit. But this is a major, major loss. In fact, if I'm looking at this, I'm going, what's actually left of this lawsuit?

If you're removing emotional distress, what is actually left? And what's left is the ability for them to prove that there was some sort of a coordinated PR campaign. Essentially, they can attach that alleged coordinated PR campaign against Blake Lively to lost earnings. Like she lost her reputation, now she can no longer be booked for movies.

If you're removing emotional distress, what is actually left? And what's left is the ability for them to prove that there was some sort of a coordinated PR campaign. Essentially, they can attach that alleged coordinated PR campaign against Blake Lively to lost earnings. Like she lost her reputation, now she can no longer be booked for movies.

If you're removing emotional distress, what is actually left? And what's left is the ability for them to prove that there was some sort of a coordinated PR campaign. Essentially, they can attach that alleged coordinated PR campaign against Blake Lively to lost earnings. Like she lost her reputation, now she can no longer be booked for movies.

And we're able to prove that Melissa, Nathan and Jennifer Abel coordinated with Wayfarer Studios to make the public hate Blake Lively. That's the only like meat and bones of the case that's remaining. And thus far, and we're pretty far along now here, she hasn't produced a single shred of evidence to that effect. This was just her paranoia.

And we're able to prove that Melissa, Nathan and Jennifer Abel coordinated with Wayfarer Studios to make the public hate Blake Lively. That's the only like meat and bones of the case that's remaining. And thus far, and we're pretty far along now here, she hasn't produced a single shred of evidence to that effect. This was just her paranoia.

And we're able to prove that Melissa, Nathan and Jennifer Abel coordinated with Wayfarer Studios to make the public hate Blake Lively. That's the only like meat and bones of the case that's remaining. And thus far, and we're pretty far along now here, she hasn't produced a single shred of evidence to that effect. This was just her paranoia.

This whole lawsuit was her being paranoid because she's so narcissistic that she could not believe that the public legitimately did not like her behavior. And so she cooked up in her paranoid head along with her psychopath husband and Allegedly, allegedly psychopath. I'm saying allegedly a sociopath, whatever's going on.

This whole lawsuit was her being paranoid because she's so narcissistic that she could not believe that the public legitimately did not like her behavior. And so she cooked up in her paranoid head along with her psychopath husband and Allegedly, allegedly psychopath. I'm saying allegedly a sociopath, whatever's going on.

This whole lawsuit was her being paranoid because she's so narcissistic that she could not believe that the public legitimately did not like her behavior. And so she cooked up in her paranoid head along with her psychopath husband and Allegedly, allegedly psychopath. I'm saying allegedly a sociopath, whatever's going on.