Catherine Austin Fitts
๐ค PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
It's not unlimited if you have to pay everybody in America off to go along with what you want to do. So part of the big cost of running the model is the American people vote based on domestic issues and don't understand what's involved in running the whole global model. And so you've basically got to buy them off and pay them off to get them to sort of go along with whatever you want to do.
It's not unlimited if you have to pay everybody in America off to go along with what you want to do. So part of the big cost of running the model is the American people vote based on domestic issues and don't understand what's involved in running the whole global model. And so you've basically got to buy them off and pay them off to get them to sort of go along with whatever you want to do.
And that's expensive. So if you look what happened at the end of when the Soviet Union collapsed, the U.S. said, we want to be a unipolar model. One of the reasons I left Washington, I said, your plan won't work. And the failure in the Ukraine was the The message plan failed.
And that's expensive. So if you look what happened at the end of when the Soviet Union collapsed, the U.S. said, we want to be a unipolar model. One of the reasons I left Washington, I said, your plan won't work. And the failure in the Ukraine was the The message plan failed.
And that's expensive. So if you look what happened at the end of when the Soviet Union collapsed, the U.S. said, we want to be a unipolar model. One of the reasons I left Washington, I said, your plan won't work. And the failure in the Ukraine was the The message plan failed.
And now we have Rubio, the Secretary of State, saying, oh, we're going to be a multi โ you know, it's a multipolar world now. So the unipolar model failed. And so the model has to change. We have to โ we're still running the reserve currency, but you have to rebalance the model. The unipolar plan didn't work, and it wasted a great deal of capital.
And now we have Rubio, the Secretary of State, saying, oh, we're going to be a multi โ you know, it's a multipolar world now. So the unipolar model failed. And so the model has to change. We have to โ we're still running the reserve currency, but you have to rebalance the model. The unipolar plan didn't work, and it wasted a great deal of capital.
And now we have Rubio, the Secretary of State, saying, oh, we're going to be a multi โ you know, it's a multipolar world now. So the unipolar model failed. And so the model has to change. We have to โ we're still running the reserve currency, but you have to rebalance the model. The unipolar plan didn't work, and it wasted a great deal of capital.
So now we have to change the model. And so if you see the president talking about โ you know, I want Canada to be the 51st state or I want Greenland. He's trying, if he can't go east-west, remember, they were going to collapse the Soviet Union, get all those resources and use that to maintain the unipolar model vis-a-vis China. Okay, that didn't work.
So now we have to change the model. And so if you see the president talking about โ you know, I want Canada to be the 51st state or I want Greenland. He's trying, if he can't go east-west, remember, they were going to collapse the Soviet Union, get all those resources and use that to maintain the unipolar model vis-a-vis China. Okay, that didn't work.
So now we have to change the model. And so if you see the president talking about โ you know, I want Canada to be the 51st state or I want Greenland. He's trying, if he can't go east-west, remember, they were going to collapse the Soviet Union, get all those resources and use that to maintain the unipolar model vis-a-vis China. Okay, that didn't work.
So now he's talking going north-south instead of going east-west, right?
So now he's talking going north-south instead of going east-west, right?
So now he's talking going north-south instead of going east-west, right?
So he's just trying to figure out, you have to change the model. And if you look at the debate and discussions going on in Washington recently, The unfortunate thing is, whoever is in the White House, they have to change the model. They don't have a choice. The technology changes in the world. Competition among various parties means we have to change the model. We have to evolve the model.
So he's just trying to figure out, you have to change the model. And if you look at the debate and discussions going on in Washington recently, The unfortunate thing is, whoever is in the White House, they have to change the model. They don't have a choice. The technology changes in the world. Competition among various parties means we have to change the model. We have to evolve the model.
So he's just trying to figure out, you have to change the model. And if you look at the debate and discussions going on in Washington recently, The unfortunate thing is, whoever is in the White House, they have to change the model. They don't have a choice. The technology changes in the world. Competition among various parties means we have to change the model. We have to evolve the model.
We have to. And so the question is, how do you do it? And unfortunately, there are too many people in America sitting around and saying, well, well, well, we don't want to change. But that's not, you know, it's not changing because whoever's in the Oval Office now wants it to change. It's changing because they got to change. You have to change with the times.
We have to. And so the question is, how do you do it? And unfortunately, there are too many people in America sitting around and saying, well, well, well, we don't want to change. But that's not, you know, it's not changing because whoever's in the Oval Office now wants it to change. It's changing because they got to change. You have to change with the times.
We have to. And so the question is, how do you do it? And unfortunately, there are too many people in America sitting around and saying, well, well, well, we don't want to change. But that's not, you know, it's not changing because whoever's in the Oval Office now wants it to change. It's changing because they got to change. You have to change with the times.