Chase Keaten
speaker
363 appearances
1 recordings
1 series
first heard Jul 2026
last heard 20 Jul
Chase Keaten’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 1 in all, peaking in Jul 2026 with 1.
Appearances
Insights Unlocked · How to build agentic AI your customers will actually trust · 20 Jul 2026
podcast
And you can really find some great applications for it when you can kind of just be aware of both those viewpoints, right?
It's hard because we live in a lot of world of gray.
And whenever either of those extreme ideologies, if either of them win, it's not going to lead to progress, either corporate or professional.
If we completely ignore how AI functions and we just decide to take a very humanistic step, like down that road, we're really not leveraging some pieces of the technology that could have
ridiculous implications in medicine and things that could really truly benefit the entirety of the human race if you just kind of like, but the cost is too high, right?
And then on the other hand, if you go straight through that lens of
Everything you do should be through that AI functionality.
If you take that to its natural extreme conclusion, that's also not great.
That's a world where in the next five years, there's not really an entry-level job anymore.
the thing that is sometimes whispered in LinkedIn channels, the ridiculous posting of entry-level job requires five years of experience actually starts to look like a reality in that space, right?
Where it's that we need people who can understand how to operate various AI agents in various different contexts, but we also need people who have done the job before, but does that exist anymore?
Because that can be done by AI agents, so.
They're both extreme views, but the tension, the interplay between them can really help inform a way to kind of move forward.
And it's kind of okay to have those two beliefs at once, even though they look like they're diametrically opposed, right?
Yeah.
Because either side, quote unquote, winning wouldn't necessarily cause a net benefit.
But there is a way to kind of like thread the needle, take a humanistic approach, but also progress.
Because progression for the sake of progression is cancer, right?
But progression for the sake of benefiting everybody is exactly why a lot of people even choose a career in this space, so.
It definitely lives in that realm of it's powerful enough that it's scary to touch.
Showing 61–80 of 363 · page 4 of 19
← Previous
Next →