Chris Clark

speaker

3,506 appearances 23 recordings 4 series first heard Oct 2023 last heard 9 Jun

Chris Clark’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 7 in all, peaking in Mar 2026 with 2.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment

Mountain View City Council · City Council on 2026-03-10 5:30 PM - REGULAR MEETING - Mar 10, 2026 · 10 Mar 2026 meeting

Certainly not a pandemic.

And to have to almost immediately go fully remote and knowing that we had to keep the city operating, that democracy has to continue.

I mean, you helped enable that.

So thank you, not just for that, but for everything else that you've done for our community.

I'm sure we'll see you around and maybe every now and then you can pop in and tell us when we do something wrong or something you don't like.

And then I just wanted to check and see if there's any public comment on the presentation items.

I don't see anyone in the queue.

Okay, well thank you again.

We'll close the presentation items and move on to item four, the consent calendar.

These items will be approved by one motion unless any member of the council wishes to pull an item for individual consideration.

And if an item is pulled from the consent calendar, it'll be considered separately following the approval of the balance of the consent calendar.

If you are here in person and would like to speak on the consent calendar or the next item, which is oral communications on non-agenda items, please just make sure you've submitted a blue card to the city clerk.

Would any member of the Council like to comment on or pull a specific consent calendar item?

Council Member Hicks.

yes i would like to pull uh 4.2 regarding a facade grant programming for a separate vote yeah separate discussion vote okay council member ramirez thank you vice mayor just a brief comment about 4.1 i want to thank staff for the commitment to return to council later with the minor amendments to align the zoning ordinance with state law i appreciate

the consideration, even if the EPC did not consider it, I appreciate your consideration of making those modifications, thank you.

And I don't see anyone else in the queue.

So 4.2 was polled, we'll take that separately.

Is there a motion to approve the balance?

And just a note that 4.1 requires reading the title of the ordinance.

Showing 421–440 of 3,506 · page 22 of 176