Chris Sharp

Can you sign it just to make sure it was accurate?

That's why he was conveying to me.

And he said that everyone who was interviewed got one of those, um,

and that they signed it to make sure that nothing was being taken out of context.

That's how he conveyed it to me.

What happened to it?

This is it.

And the fact that he didn't deal, well, he says he didn't deal with the Herrera case.

Yeah, it's disappointing that I couldn't get a good answer on that one.

Yeah, he just would not get into any detail about those specific cases, although he did mention that he was very, very proud that that was a gap that he knew of and that they had started a collaboration led by him with Space Force and Space Command to ensure they were getting that data.

And he was mentioning as well that if it's not a threat,

or seen as hostile, they usually won't pay attention to something that they see out in space or in orbit or something like that.

So it was important to make sure that you were picking up those kinds of cases.

So yeah, that was something that came to mind, yeah.

Yeah, so he basically said that we were able to conclusively prove it wasn't a known system, either adversary or friendly.

Okay, so did he explain what methodology he used to reach that conclusion?

he only went so far to say that they would call up contractors of certain elements within the DOW and I think the intelligence community as well to say look is this one of yours no it's not one of yours and I'm not sure how they're able to determine though that it wasn't an adversary technology as well but he said conclusively so if you take him at his word that's pretty big

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

So again, he's using that terminology from my understanding.

You might need to correct me, but he was saying that basically we found no evidence, verifiable evidence or something like that, of extraterrestrial or aliens or anything like that.