Chris Williamson

I don't know whether that is on average true for women to be more emotionally in tune and developed than men are in the same way as high levels of degree accomplishment and high levels of financial success are true.

By the way, the stat of women out-earning men is now they out-earn men up to the age of 32.

It was 29 previously, and I think it's maybe 32, 33.

This is a big window for women to try and date in.

So I don't know if it's asymmetric growth on average or just asymmetric growth for you and all of the other women that listen to Modern Wisdom, obviously.

Also, if they've been absorbing the British accent, I imagine that's probably a competitive disadvantage too within the market.

You're like...

It's very difficult to compete with a British accent, okay?

So hold on to the American accent, at least, if you're from America.

How do we address this asymmetric growth?

Is it a problem of how we incentivize men toward internal work, or is it that we lack therapy or growth models specifically tailored to men?

I certainly think both of those things, because the two things are interlinked.

Men will be more likely to do a modality of emotional development that they think is

and that they can see will give them outcomes that they want.

If you have therapy and growth models specifically tailored to men, they're more likely to

observe the direct outcome, beneficial outcome that they want and pursue it.

I think rather than trying to sort of whip men into doing it or guilt men into doing it or shame them into doing it, it's much better to just make it so attractive and so obviously beneficial to them that they want to do it.

That to me seems to be like just incentives, incentives, align the fucking incentives.

And if you align the incentives so that a guy goes, Hey,

I can actually see how this would benefit me in ways that I care about.