Dave Lawler

And by all accounts, I think his opposition, you know, I saw some praise for the ACLU's performance in court today.

So I think he missed that.

I think Trump was only there for the solicitor general's argument.

But again, I would guess, as Dave pointed out, that this is not a case that's going to go entirely in Trump's direction.

The question of whether the conservatives on the court try to carve out some

something short of entirely throwing it out will be an interesting thing to watch.

Trivadius as well.

I'm impressed that you knew my middle name.

That's pretty lucky.

Oh, my God.

Can you imagine if that is your middle name?

Anthropic has put some limitations on how clawed can be used.

They don't want it to be used, for example, for the mass surveillance of Americans.

They also don't want it to be used to develop autonomous weapons, weapons that can fire without human involvement.

The Pentagon is not quibbling so much with those two stipulations, but they're just saying Anthropic doesn't get to set any guardrails whatsoever.

If you do business with the Pentagon, we're going to use your tool however we see fit.

Lawler was the first to break the story.

we have one of two options.

We will either declare you a supply chain risk, which would mean not only do we sever our contract with you, but anyone who does business with the Pentagon will not be able to use your software.

And then there's the other option, which is to use the Defense Production Act,