David Patrick Caracos (Promo Speaker)
speaker
368 appearances
22 recordings
1 series
first heard Nov 2024
last heard May 2025
David Patrick Caracos (Promo Speaker)’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
Sort of. I mean, yeah, in layman's terms, yeah, that's the easiest way to do it. But look, so let's just say Diddy's team asked to have this adjourned for X amount of months or however long to prepare. Number one, the state or the government, they have to agree to it. I would assume they would. But the judge then has to agree to it. And I would assume they do vice versa.
The state wants to have it postponed. Diddy's attorneys have to agree to it as well. And there could be a little game of chicken, if you will, where one party says, oh, yeah, I want to I want to have it postponed. But the other says, no, we're ready to go. The judge is going to have to make the call there. But usually one party wants to have it adjourned and postponed to prepare more.
The judge is going to agree to do it. Ninety nine percent of the time. I don't see it happening where they're not going to do so.
It's creative. I will go with that. It's very creative. Look, attorneys, one of our main jobs is to make creative arguments. All right. Because a lot of times we're going to have cases that are not the easiest ones to deal with. They're not black and white by any means. So you have to come up with some creativity. Diddy's attorneys, they're getting paid a ton of money.
So they're making their money worthier. And I think it's a good argument. I don't know how the judge is going to look at it, but I like it. I think it just shows you're thinking outside the box. To be honest, I think there may be a little truth to it. You know, who is the government to dictate what is good for everybody to see versus not? I think they have something to go back on.
Well, they don't have a consent agreement between the defense and the government. then they're going to have to argue it. They're going to both brief their own sides, meaning they're going to have to do written arguments, and then they're going to argue them in front of the judge, and the judge is going to rule however they decide.
I think the judge is going to rule not the whole way that Diddy Seymour wants, but I think they're going to get access to it at a much greater rate than they have it now.
Everybody says that.
You have to. I'd be very surprised if Diddy says, I'm guilty. So I don't see that happening. Everybody does that. You have to do that. You always have to enter not guilty pleasing. You have to fight it. You don't know how these cases are going to unravel. All right. Every case is different. I tell this to every client of mine.
And when I was a prosecutor, I tell it to every victim as well, if there are victims, even though you might have the same charges as, you know, Joe Schmoe with the street. That doesn't necessarily mean that the facts and the evidence are the same because one case is definitely going to be different than the other.
In this situation, Diddy is very different than pretty much anybody else in the world. He's very wealthy. He's extremely well known. He's a celebrity. So all these things.
including the evidence that they have or don't have you have to see how it plays out you have to examine every piece of it uh i i could see them maybe trying to get a plea deal but they have to go through every little nook and cranny of discovery meaning the defense does before they should even contemplate having a plea so i i think plea negotiations will happen one way or another.
I don't know when, but I think it's very likely that it will happen. But for Diddy to proclaim his innocence, if he didn't, I'd be shocked.
So that does happen, although that's very rare. That's very rare because, you know, when you're in trial, unless it's going horribly for one person or one side, you're going to finish it because you've already gotten this far. Might as well let a jury decide it from there.
You know, it's a good question. I doubt it due to the fact that we're talking, number one, the DOJ with Pam Bondi and whoever the United States attorney for the Eastern District is going to be. I would have a feeling that they are probably going to be even stronger on crime than the previous DOJ and administration. So I would think it'd be very, very unlikely.
that anything will change regarding any pleas or how this case is being looked at by the government. If anything, I think it's probably going to be worse for Diddy because the new U.S. attorney, whoever they may be and whoever looks at it, they may say, you know what? I don't like what I see here at all. No deals. Go for it all. So I don't see it changing. I see it potentially getting worse.
That's a tough one. That's a tough one. I don't know. Look, if I have to say right now, I'd probably say no. But, you know, I'm not 100% about that. Again, trials, they're a crapshoot. And even though the government probably has a ton of evidence, you don't know how 12 jurors are going to act and how they're going to decide. And I think it's going to be very interesting.
And I don't think we're going to really... fully grasp and fully know what the government has and what Diddy's team has until we get much closer to trial and even in trial. But from everything I'm reading so far and what we all know, it's an uphill climb, but anything can change.
I love being with you guys. This is great.
Well, Kayla, you're exactly right. I expected it. I mean, frankly, if you didn't expect it, you probably got some issues. You know, this was the third or fourth time that Diddy's defense attorneys requested a bond review. And each time was the same thing. The judge and the U.S. attorney's office had all said they think that Diddy is a danger
Showing 281–300 of 368 · page 15 of 19
← Previous
Next →