David Patrick Caracos (Promo Speaker)
speaker
368 appearances
22 recordings
1 series
first heard Nov 2024
last heard May 2025
David Patrick Caracos (Promo Speaker)’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
to the community where he is going to talk to other potential witnesses in the matter. And also, it was alleged through court papers from the U.S. Attorney's Office that he already did try to contact people. His family tried to contact people. His inner circle tried to contact individuals, potentially to pay them off not to talk. And Diddy went to great lengths to do so.
He even used other individuals in the federal prisons social network to kind of help and facilitate everything. So all these things coming together, it doesn't matter how much money Diddy is putting up for bond. He could put a billion dollars up. $50 million. $50 million is a lot. If you have $50 million or I have $50 million, let's split it up or something here. It doesn't matter how much money
He puts up again, it could be a billion dollars. The judge is not being swayed by the money and it's certain. And even, you know, with the other conditions that the defense attorneys put up or that he can only be in one or two houses, he can't have internet connections or anything like that. The judge didn't buy it. And, you know, you could see that through the tea leaves automatically.
I mean, they could do one every week if they wanted to, but that would be foolish. I don't think it's going to happen much more or unless the trial is postponed, which I don't think it's going to be happening when they say when they have it scheduled in April or May. There's just no way it'll happen. I can't anticipate that they would probably try to file another bail motion next
you know, right around that time. And again, let's remember this. The client is probably the one dictating this to the attorneys. The attorneys aren't saying, oh, let's file another bail motion. You have a client in P. Diddy who probably is not the most easiest guy to deal with, I would assume, right now. And he's been used to getting everything he's ever wanted, and he's got a lot of money.
He can do that. But when you are in the legal system and when you are in a federal jail, things change a little bit.
Prepare. Prepare for trial. That's what I would say. Look, I always tell this to clients. You're my client, and I'm going to do what I think is the best for you in this situation because you're paying me a lot of money to do that. I don't want your opinion unless I'm asking for it. And it's called client control. You have to have it.
If you don't, you're probably not going to be a very good attorney doing it. So you have to tell your client the truth, even though they may not want to hear it. And I don't know what the relationship is between Diddy and his attorneys, but they should probably have some better client control.
And even though it's P Diddy, he's a very powerful individual, very hard nose, if you will, from what I understand, you still got to do a job. So I would say, Diddy, let's stop worrying about your bail. Not going to happen. Let's try to prepare for trial.
Good. I'm glad.
They're right, it is. And the judge agreed with them because there were handwritten notes from Diddy that were confiscated during the raid, and the judge specifically told the federal prosecutors, you better destroy them immediately. So that is attorney-client privilege. To have a raid on an individual that's currently incarcerated, it's very rare. It doesn't happen often.
So for them to do this, they really must have thought that there was some extraordinary activity going on with Diddy and maybe, you know, outside influences, if you will. And that's why they did this. But even if that's 100 percent accurate, you still cannot take notes or or or documentation from the inmate where it's, you know,
correspondence between him and his uh attorneys or in the alternative you know his his plain notes where he's just preparing for trial which is again that's confidential that's only for him so that was a big no-no well what are some things that would prompt a raid of a jail cell uh a couple things so reading the the uh the motion from the government
It is that Diddy is using not only outside influences like family and friends to get in contact with individuals who could testify against him and try to pay them off. But he's using individuals inside of the prison. to actually do the same thing. So he's using specific messaging apps from, not him, but from other inmates' cell phones or electronic devices.
And he's also using other inmates' phone numbers because everybody has their own set of phone number in the federal prison. So, in detention center, I should say. So he's using those numbers and those apps to contact people who, again, are going to testify against them potentially. That's called witness tampering. You're not allowed to do that.
And I guess it really just got to a point where it's almost become public. I mean, individuals have stated, Ray J stated, I believe, that, you know, these individuals are being contacted. And when that happens, the government, they're going to come down on you and they're going to come down on you hard. And Diddy found that out firsthand.
Yeah, so a filter team pretty much redacts information, private information that the prosecutors are not allowed to have. It's not allowed to be public or anything like that because you got to remember all these motions are public knowledge if you think about it. So, you know, there could be Social Security numbers on there or just private information in general.
And so a filter team, it's actually pretty common when it comes to the federal government where they get a plethora of evidence. And I'm talking about like boxes and boxes and boxes. All right. And not in this particular instance. But you have to have a whole team really go through it and make sure what can and cannot be used or seen for that matter. Right. And so that's what they do.
They're common. They're very common. But again, this particular raid on an inmate in a federal facility, that is not common.
They could try, yes, they definitely could. However, I don't think they will be successful in doing so because, I don't understand, the underlying reason why they asked for the raid and got the raid approved by the DOJ is because of improper messaging and improper communications with potential witnesses. So that's the underlying thing.
Showing 301–320 of 368 · page 16 of 19
← Previous
Next →