David Patrick Caracos (Promo Speaker)
speaker
368 appearances
22 recordings
1 series
first heard Nov 2024
last heard May 2025
David Patrick Caracos (Promo Speaker)’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
And that doesn't seem to be not or that hasn't been not proven yet, if you will. I think they're still having that. They still have to find out if that's accurate or not. And the judge has to make that determination. But just because they took a couple of different things that are attorney and client privilege, that's being destroyed. So kind of no harm, no foul, if you will.
I don't think they're going to be very successful in trying to get the federal prosecutors off of this case.
It's all allegations.
Well, he could, but he's also going to face additional charges if that happens because the federal government is then going to just hit him with a slew of charges for witness tampering and maybe other co-defendants as well. Not co-defendants, but other individuals who are acting on his behalf. I've read that his sons have been contacting individuals.
they could then be subject to federal crimes of witness tampering. Other associates associated with Diddy and his family also could be subject to that. So I think it would definitely hurt Diddy if this did come out. Furthermore, You know, Diddy's been trying to get out for a while, trying to get bail.
And if you're contacting witnesses in jail or having other people do it at your behest, a judge is never going to let you out of jail. So either way, it doesn't look good.
There really isn't. Although, you know, if they're reading the tea leaves, which, you know, his attorneys are very, very good from what I from what I gather. they're going to probably tell Diddy, you know, all right, enough. We lost. All right, we're not doing it. There has to be a change of circumstance for them to really have another shot at the apple, if you will.
And at this particular time, I think they've had, what, two or three motions already? And I think this third one right now is still being considered by the judge. But there's not a change of circumstance. All they're doing is saying, all right, judge, look, We will make even more restrictions for Diddy. We'll put up X amount of dollars, $50 million.
He can only go to his residence in New York City or Miami. And once he's there, he has to stay there. He can't have anybody there. He can't make any phone calls except to his legal team. He can't go on the Internet, can't do X, Y, Z. So they're trying to put more conditions on there. The problem is where is a change in circumstance? And there isn't any.
There's nothing that's changed from the previous position. The only thing that's changed right now is that there's allocations that Diddy and his team are contacting individuals. That's not going to bode well for him.
You know, I think that's a little that's going a little too far for the prosecutors, in my opinion. You know, is it true that they did that to potentially influence jurors? Maybe. Who knows? But. I don't buy it. You know, this is and a judge certainly isn't going to buy it. You know, how are they possibly going to prove that was their intent? They're not. They will never be able to do so.
Now, you know, did they do that for that reason? No.
Yeah, the government, they're trying to stack everything they possibly can. Any scintilla of evidence of interference for witnesses, they're going to use it. Some of it is probably going to hold up. Some of it won't. I doubt this is going to be one of those things that holds up.
Kayla, I mean, you hit the nail on the head right there. Don't believe everything you read.
all right i'm sure there's probably some truths uh you know here and there but there's a lot of gray area and you know that's what's going to be coming out uh you know probably in the not too distant future and that's why we have this podcast so we can break it down and you can make your decisions or your opinions for yourself
I don't think it's going to do much, honestly. They're grasping at straws here. They're doing anything they possibly can. And look, a lot of this, I have a feeling, is coming from Diddy himself. You know, look, when you have a client who is
very well-known, very powerful, has a lot of money like Diddy, who's used to getting his way, you're going to make your will known, and it has to be through your attorneys. I've had to deal with it a lot where I've had clients who tell me specifically, hey, I want you to ask this judge this. I'm going to let them know.
Look, the judge is going to tell you no right off the bat, but if you want me to do it, sure. What's the worst they're going to say? I have a feeling that's exactly what's happening here. Diddy is probably just telling his attorneys, I don't want to come out in shackles. I don't like how it looks. No kidding. Nobody's going to like how it looks being in shackles.
But the public is not going to see that because, like you said, there's no cameras. There's no pictures here. It's only a court stenographer. So I don't think it's a lot going on there, if you will.
No, not in this lifetime. No. He looks at Diddy just like any other defendant that comes before him. Diddy has a lot more money than everybody else, but the judge doesn't really care and won't see it like that. I guarantee you he will not grant that request.
Showing 321–340 of 368 · page 17 of 19
← Previous
Next →