Dr. Andrea Love

speaker
239 appearances 2 recordings 2 series first heard Apr 2025 last heard May 2025

Dr. Andrea Love’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months
No recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment
The Checkup with Doctor Mike · Are Everyday Chemicals ACTUALLY Harming Your Health · 7 May 2025 podcast
So what ended up happening was companies were like, well, people don't want parabens, even though parabens are overwhelmingly safe and there's actually no human data that shows that it's a cancer risk. They're not going to buy these products anymore. So they have to kowtow to the public perception, which is part of the problem that we're in these days. And we have cleaner products because of it.
We actually don't. We actually don't. So what ended up happening was some companies omitted preservatives outright and we saw a huge uptick in contamination and infections as a result, including... Not true. That is not true that I've ever heard of. I have actual data. So I know you don't have data, but I'm a scientist, so I have data.
There was spikes in ocular infections because parabens are used in certain ophthalmic treatments as well as contamination and bacterial infections from preservative-free lotions, skincare products, baby wipes and so on. I have a very long list because I did an extensive presentation at a cosmetic chemistry conference on parabens specifically. So one route was no preservatives.
We're going to market it as preservative free because preservatives, just like synthetic chemicals, sound scary, even though they actually improve the quality and quantity of our lives. The other option was other companies opted for alternative preservatives, one of which is methyl isothiazolinone or MIT. Now, MIT is also an effective antimicrobial. It has about 10% allergenicity.
So what ended up happening was when companies switched to MIT over parabens, huge rates of dermatologic allergies, skin allergies were happening because this was being swapped out in cosmetic products, lotions, make-ups, etc. So you're swapping for a safer...
more well studied preservative because of public outcry and chemophobia and misinformation for a less safe, more allergenic preservative because of all this misinformation. So you can provide information to people and I think that's what we should be doing, but it needs to be the accurate information and factual information and not information that's based on the eye of the beholder.
No, it's actually not. This is based on empirical data. Empirical data is what determines objective reality. What we have instead is not objective facts and evidence-based information. It's the appeal to nature fallacy and also telling people that they shouldn't trust
Unternehmen, Wissenschaftler, die ihre Karriere an der Studie der chemischen Komposition, wie sie mit uns interagieren, wie sie von unseren Körpern exkretiert werden. Aber anstattdessen sollten wir unsere Homemade-at-Home-Produkte machen, die keine Sicherheit, keine Regulierung, keine Überzeugung, keine Chemie. Do you think that the idea that parabens were excluded unnecessarily?
They're useful to cause health anxiety.
So you made a quote, you said, I won't lie, eating mostly organic foods and buying chemical-free consumer products can be expensive, so I've come up with some hacks and tips to save money while making safer choices, which I share throughout this book. Everything is a chemical. We need to understand that your body is... Vinegar is a chemical. It's acetic acid. Agreed.
Your actual body is made up of a network of chemicals. Your cells are chemical networks. Your cell membranes are chemicals. If you don't fully understand this... But everyone understands. I don't understand. What's your point?
You're saying that we should be avoiding synthetic chemicals. Synthetic chemicals. There's nothing inherently bad about a synthetic chemical.
Where do they get their funding from? You just said that you trust these apps to make these product recommendations, but your whole book is telling people to not trust scientists and trust your anecdote about your farm.
These apps make money by getting subscribers that they scare about products and the products that they rate as bad. haben synthetische Chemikalien oder verwenden konventionelle Landwirtschaft oder haben Preservativen. Also ist es sehr viel die Begründung der Natur-Fallasie.
Und der Grund, warum die Begründung der Natur-Fallasie ist, ist, weil es der falsche Glauben ist, dass natürliche Substanzen und Chemikalien inhaltlich besser, sicherer sind. Ja, genau. has no bearing on its safety or potential harm. And your entire book is antithetical to that.
It tells people that they should be scared of synthetic chemicals by and large, without any context, and that they should not have any issues trusting any sort of entity that is making money by telling them that they should only source natural products. Not exactly.
Es gibt natürliche Formen von Farben. Und Kokonillen haben höhere Allergen-Rate als ein rotes Farben. Es gibt keine Frage, dass regrettbare Substitutionen existieren.
My website is immunologic.org. And my social handle is at dr.andrealove. Cool. Thank you.
It's Been a Minute · Crunchy conservatives want to 'Make America Healthy Again' · 7 Apr 2025 podcast
Did you know that this toxic chemical could be on your food?
And more. You have this kind of ecosystem where now it's the wellness industry and all these podcasters who are telling you the truth that the scientists and the doctors and the government are hiding from you. And that has led to the explosion of kind of this alt-right wellness industry.
Showing 201–220 of 239 · page 11 of 12 ← Previous Next →