Dr. Andrea Love

speaker
239 appearances 2 recordings 2 series first heard Apr 2025 last heard May 2025

Dr. Andrea Love’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months
No recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment
The Checkup with Doctor Mike · Are Everyday Chemicals ACTUALLY Harming Your Health · 7 May 2025 podcast
Es ist die gleiche Wissenschaft, die goldenen Reis erschaffen hat, die die Landwirte in den Philippinen ermöglicht hat, mit Vitamin A Reis zu wachsen, weil Vitamin A, legitime Vitamin-A-Defizienz, eine große Ursache für pädiatrische Leidenschaft und Tod ist. And that was approved. It was developed in the 1990s.
GE crops undergo the most rigorous field and safety studies of any crops grown conventional, organic or otherwise. It was approved. It was developed in the 1990s. Golden rice. It was approved in the Philippines for farmers to grow in 2021. And a judge, because of misinformation scaring people about GMOs, rescinded that last year in 2024.
So now we go from a developing nation that golden rice would literally save millions of children's lives to now farmers being told they're not able to grow this. And this was provided passively. Patentfree, you know, there's a lot of claims about how it's all this big ad kind of evil, you know, monopoly.
But when we talk about things like BT eggplant, which allow farmers in developing nations to grow eggplant with fewer insecticides. Well, that was provided patentfree, low cost so that.
GMOs haben die Anzahl der Pestizide, die wir zusammen über die letzten 20 Jahre genutzt haben, reduziert und es ermöglicht, die Nahrung von Färben zu erhöhen, weil diese wissenschaftlichen Mittel eine Innovation sind, die unsere Gesundheit verbessert.
But I want to understand, because you said that, you know, people should be avoiding all these man-made chemicals. So why should they not be avoiding... Was ist ein organischer Komponent? You you omit all of the. So, for example, let's talk about like Salison, right? Salison was the precursor. It's derived from Willow Bark and it has analgesic properties. Aspirin. No, it's not aspirin.
Actually, it's Salison. Salison has. Potentially very severe adverse effects. And thanks to chemical synthesis, we converted it to acetylsalicylic acid, which is aspirin. And sulfasalazine, which is another drug I use for my patients. So acetylsalicylic aspirin is man-made. It has better safety profile. It has better analgesic properties than the natural salicin.
So why do you have a problem with man-made chemicals? Well, who has access to salicin? Well, you're proving my point. You're undermining man-made chemicals.
What about copper sulfate? You don't have a problem with copper sulfate being 26.6 times more toxic?
Was ist die Information, die unklar ist, dass synthetische Chemikalien eine große Bedeutung haben und natürliche Chemikalien sind völlig sicher und du solltest diese 21-Tage etwas für dein Körper detoxifizieren, wenn deine Organsysteme das für dich tun. Hast du den 21-Tag-Plan gesehen?
Wie hast du das Buch gelesen? I was provided it to read during my prep for the episode. Okay, good, good, good. So I know that you said in the opening that you believe that environmental exposures are the number one cause of chronic and acute diseases. And as we talked about autoimmune disorders.
Sie sagte, ähm, ich habe eigentlich die Quote, warte mal. Ähm, ich glaube, dass wirtschaftliche Chemikalien die Nummer eins sind, weil sie die meisten akuten und chronischen Krankheitsbedürfnisse sind. Das ist auf Seite 22 des Buches. Also, das ist objektiv falsch. Das ist unerlässlich Information, die das ganze Buch auf der Bühne ist. Aber ich sagte, ich glaube. Ich glaube.
Ja, du glaubst, und das Glauben ist falsch.
Es könnte einen Schaden für bestimmte Auslösungen geben. Und das ist der Grund, warum die Dose den Pest und die echte Identität der Chemie und der Identität der Auslösung wichtig ist, richtig?
The central theme of this book is that environmental chemicals are the number one cause of acute and chronic illnesses and goes into a litany of synthetic chemicals, bad, everything else we're not even going to talk about. When if you looked at the biggest determinants of both acute and chronic health outcomes, environmental chemicals are not in the top five, right?
We're talking about healthcare access. Yes, lifestyle, but we're talking about corporate talking. When we talk about lifestyle, we're not talking about Ernährung, Ernährung, Schlaf, Stress-Management, Fibre, nicht zu essen, nicht zu essen, organisch gegen konventionell. Das ist ein kleiner Teil dieses ganzen Buches. Eigentlich hast du viele, viele Teile an organisch in dem Buch.
Yes, and drinking should be driven by evidence-based guidance. And that's why when you talk to all credible registered dietitians who are the experts on clinical guidance for diet, they all say that messaging that tells people that organic good, conventional bad, does way more harm.
Yeah, I mean, it's a great question and it's a reason why there's a difference between a clinician and scientists, right? Scientists are the ones that conduct scientific studies and they ask all these questions, right? That's why we look at Toxicologists look at both chronic and acute exposures when also setting all of these safety thresholds.
So a chronic exposure assumes an exposure of that level every single day for the course of a human life. So all of these pesticides, any regulated chemical. And again, that excludes organic pesticides because they don't fall under the regulation and also excludes like all the dietary supplements, which also don't fall under regulation.
But we have data for those values, both the acute and the chronic levels at which there might be a health risk. Right. And so those are assessed based on the actual chemical itself. the nature of the chemical, right? What class of chemical is it? What functional groups that chemical has? Because a chemical is not just the sum of its parts, right?
Showing 161–180 of 239 · page 9 of 12 ← Previous Next →