Dr. Andrea Love

speaker
239 appearances 2 recordings 2 series first heard Apr 2025 last heard May 2025

Dr. Andrea Love’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months
No recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment
The Checkup with Doctor Mike · Are Everyday Chemicals ACTUALLY Harming Your Health · 7 May 2025 podcast
Diese sind zweimal so toxisch wie Glyphosat.
I mean, before I address it.
Nun, es retten Bäuer, von anderen Herbiziden zu verwenden, die schlimmer sind.
I'm not here to battle, I'm not here to support... I want to finish my thought about the glyphosate, because she brought it up and she opened the door and I want to address this misinformation that has been going on for 30, 50 years.
Oh, so the claims that glyphosate and GMOs are harmful, that it causes leaky gut, that it causes celiac disease, that it's causing cancer. I mean, glyphosate is the poster child for demonization of both conventional farming and GMOs writ large. Und meistens von Leuten, die keine Chemie oder Genetik verstehen. Wir gehen gleich zurück.
So, can I go back to the... So, this compound is, as I mentioned, they put a bacterial version of this enzyme into six different crop species. It's not impacted. There is an emergence of certain weeds that have developed... It is not. It is not. Ich meine, es ist 100 Prozent. Wir müssen das googeln.
Und auch die Europäische Kommission hat die Registrierung von Glyphosat bis 2033 wieder geöffnet.
Einiges von Miami, New York.
Also Glyphosat ist kosteneffektiv, ermöglicht Landwirten, saubere Erdbeeren zu benutzen, um Weide zu kontrollieren. Es wird nur in einem spezifischen Erwärmungszyklus benutzt. Und wenn Menschen davon ausgesprochen werden, würde es auf einem Sojabaseprodukt sein, normalerweise etwas, das Sojabeenöl oder so weiter hat.
And the levels that people are exposed to that might be in these products, they're detected by urine, right? So urine is a waste product, which means that your body is excreting it like it's supposed to. And so they're finding things like 390 to 400 parts per trillion of glyphosate in urine samples.
What those people that say that fail to leave out is that they also looked at people who said that they eat organic food. And the levels were the same. So this is not... Uniquely because of conventional foods versus organic foods. And there's also no health impact of these levels because one, your body literally does not have this enzyme.
There's no plausible mechanism of action, especially at those levels. Now, when we talk about the cancer claims, It's really important to understand that the IARC or the International Agency for Research on Cancer is one working group of the WHO. There is a different organization entity within the WHO called the Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives, the JECFA.
And they have also done safety assessments on glyphosate. But the IRC is the only agency, I don't even want to call it an agency because it's a working group, that performs hazard assessment, not risk assessment.
Now, in the context of glyphosate, the president of the IRC, or at least the president at the time, a gentleman named Christopher Wild, he actually omitted the largest epidemiological longitudinal study of farm workers in Glyphosate-Exposure. 55.000 Landwirte und über 12.000 ihrer Schwestern haben sie für mehrere Jahrzehnte getrackt. Es heißt das Landwirtschafts- und Gesundheitsstudium.
Und sie schauten sich an, wie die gefährlichen Krankheiten aus dem Ausfall von Glyphosat aussehen, seit Jahren als Landwirte. Und es gab keine Beziehung zu Glyphosate-Exposure und Krankheitsaufkommen. Das ist der Grund, over 20 different scientific expert agencies around the world. This is not just EPA.
This is European Food Safety Authority, Health Canada, New Zealand and Australian Food Safety Agency, Japan Health Safety Agency, France, it's called ANSYS, or maybe that's the Brazilian one, but Brazil, France, Germany, etc., European Commission, they have all...
definitively stated and repeatedly definitively state that glyphosate poses no risk to human health, whether we're talking about farm workers who are exposed to higher rates of it or trace inconsequential exposures through food consumption. There's no data.
Glyphosate is probably one of the most studied chemistries on the planet because of misinformation from organizations like the Environmental Working Group, like Moms Across America and other agencies. that kind of paint themselves as these champions of health, but in reality are actually undermining 50 years of data.
And if you talk to farmers, this threat to their livelihood and also the threat to their safety, because they're the ones that are going to have to switch to a worse herbicide if glyphosate gets banned, it's also going to lead to billions of dollars in food cost, which is going to be transferred to consumers. Now, when we talk about genetic engineering, Aber Glyphosate und GMOs sind nicht gleich.
Wir benutzen genetische Engineering für viele Dinge. Es gibt eigentlich keine GMO-Strawberrie, die existiert. Aber wenn wir über genetische Ingenieure denken, ist die gleiche Wissenschaft, die es gibt, um G-Kräfte zu erschaffen. Es ist die gleiche Wissenschaft, die wir benutzen, um Zelltherapien für Kanzer zu erschaffen.
Showing 141–160 of 239 · page 8 of 12 ← Previous Next →