Dr. Matthew Hill

Two to five minutes, I would say. It's pretty fast. I mean, so this is one of the things with cannabis is – And again, this will kind of go into this idea of the change in potency of the plant as well. Yeah. it's pretty quick and people titrate cannabis pretty well. Like at least people who've used it a couple of times and understand this.

Depending again on how you, so again, this can vary. So like, you know, cannabis from the 70s was like, I don't know, 5% THC, let's say. It was pretty low. And nowadays cannabis is, a lot of the commercial stuff is between 20 and 30. Although whether those are super accurate numbers, not entirely clear, but so it's gone up a fair amount.

Depending again on how you, so again, this can vary. So like, you know, cannabis from the 70s was like, I don't know, 5% THC, let's say. It was pretty low. And nowadays cannabis is, a lot of the commercial stuff is between 20 and 30. Although whether those are super accurate numbers, not entirely clear, but so it's gone up a fair amount.

Depending again on how you, so again, this can vary. So like, you know, cannabis from the 70s was like, I don't know, 5% THC, let's say. It was pretty low. And nowadays cannabis is, a lot of the commercial stuff is between 20 and 30. Although whether those are super accurate numbers, not entirely clear, but so it's gone up a fair amount.

Yeah. Basically, you're talking about a beer or a wine to a spirit.

Yeah. Basically, you're talking about a beer or a wine to a spirit.

Yeah. Basically, you're talking about a beer or a wine to a spirit.

So I would say this is what's super interesting. And this was something that came out of the way that cannabis research is done, certainly in the States. And Canada has been quite behind on this, even with legalization, we haven't caught up.

So I would say this is what's super interesting. And this was something that came out of the way that cannabis research is done, certainly in the States. And Canada has been quite behind on this, even with legalization, we haven't caught up.

So I would say this is what's super interesting. And this was something that came out of the way that cannabis research is done, certainly in the States. And Canada has been quite behind on this, even with legalization, we haven't caught up.

But they have been doing lab-based studies of cannabis, you know, Meg Haney, Harriet DeWitt, this cluster of researchers around the country, Ziva Cooper at UCLA here, have all done this where, you know, you have people come into the lab, you give them cannabis, you measure subjective outcomes or neuroimaging outcomes or whatnot. So to do this,

But they have been doing lab-based studies of cannabis, you know, Meg Haney, Harriet DeWitt, this cluster of researchers around the country, Ziva Cooper at UCLA here, have all done this where, you know, you have people come into the lab, you give them cannabis, you measure subjective outcomes or neuroimaging outcomes or whatnot. So to do this,

But they have been doing lab-based studies of cannabis, you know, Meg Haney, Harriet DeWitt, this cluster of researchers around the country, Ziva Cooper at UCLA here, have all done this where, you know, you have people come into the lab, you give them cannabis, you measure subjective outcomes or neuroimaging outcomes or whatnot. So to do this,

you can't use commercial cannabis and pre even like the state by state legalizations hasn't changed this. So if you are doing cannabis research in humans and you're funded by like NIDA, which is National Institute of Drug Abuse, you get all your cannabis sourced I mean, this may be changing. I think there are some shifts that are happening.

you can't use commercial cannabis and pre even like the state by state legalizations hasn't changed this. So if you are doing cannabis research in humans and you're funded by like NIDA, which is National Institute of Drug Abuse, you get all your cannabis sourced I mean, this may be changing. I think there are some shifts that are happening.

you can't use commercial cannabis and pre even like the state by state legalizations hasn't changed this. So if you are doing cannabis research in humans and you're funded by like NIDA, which is National Institute of Drug Abuse, you get all your cannabis sourced I mean, this may be changing. I think there are some shifts that are happening.

But historically, in all the literature that we would talk about that's kind of pre the last couple of years, all that cannabis came from one source, which was, I believe, a farm in Mississippi that was essentially funded by NIDA to produce cannabis. Lucky farm. Yeah.

But historically, in all the literature that we would talk about that's kind of pre the last couple of years, all that cannabis came from one source, which was, I believe, a farm in Mississippi that was essentially funded by NIDA to produce cannabis. Lucky farm. Yeah.

But historically, in all the literature that we would talk about that's kind of pre the last couple of years, all that cannabis came from one source, which was, I believe, a farm in Mississippi that was essentially funded by NIDA to produce cannabis. Lucky farm. Yeah.

Well, the cannabis that came out of it, though – and this is one of the reasons a lot of the clinical stuff people have kind of been like, oh, I don't know how representative this is because it reflects cannabis that I would say is more from like the 70s or 80s. So it would be like 5% to 9% kind of THC cannabis. Now –