Dr. Nancy Siegel

Well, they were happy to meet the twin, and most of the time they got along pretty well, although lacking a shared social history, there were bumps along the way in some of the relationships.

But they were angry.

They were so angry at this purposeful separation done for the blind scientific ambitions of these researchers.

It was anger and the parents were angry too.

They wanted to know everything about their child that they could.

And yet this one very fundamental thing that their child was a twin was not told to them.

And many of them requested twins.

You know, these are childless couples.

They were dying for children.

And some of them requested twins from the agency and were told there are none.

And some of the parents who gave up the children requested that the children stay together.

And they were not, they were purposely put apart.

And that to me is just so unheard of.

And you know, I met Peter Neubauer and he showed absolutely no remorse, absolutely no remorse for what he did, zero.

It's hard for me to understand that.

He just didn't see that you don't deprive somebody of the celebrated relationship.

Well...

The investigators claim that they were closed because they wanted to protect the twins.

But in my perspective, they were closed to protect the investigators.

And there's this idea of secrecy surrounding them.