Dr. Tristan Ingalls

I have never met Charles Manson and nor have I ever evaluated him even though I had been working at the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation at the time of his incarceration. I never worked at his institution, though. So what I'm sharing is based on what was made public. And it's obviously for education and entertainment purposes only.

I have never met Charles Manson and nor have I ever evaluated him even though I had been working at the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation at the time of his incarceration. I never worked at his institution, though. So what I'm sharing is based on what was made public. And it's obviously for education and entertainment purposes only.

I have never met Charles Manson and nor have I ever evaluated him even though I had been working at the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation at the time of his incarceration. I never worked at his institution, though. So what I'm sharing is based on what was made public. And it's obviously for education and entertainment purposes only.

But with that being said, there have been a number of diagnoses over the years of Charles Manson. And in 1997, he was re-evaluated by a team of psychologists.

But with that being said, there have been a number of diagnoses over the years of Charles Manson. And in 1997, he was re-evaluated by a team of psychologists.

But with that being said, there have been a number of diagnoses over the years of Charles Manson. And in 1997, he was re-evaluated by a team of psychologists.

I have taken lectures from one of the forensic psychologists who was part of this reevaluation, and the results of this were made public after his death with his permission and with the permission of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

I have taken lectures from one of the forensic psychologists who was part of this reevaluation, and the results of this were made public after his death with his permission and with the permission of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

I have taken lectures from one of the forensic psychologists who was part of this reevaluation, and the results of this were made public after his death with his permission and with the permission of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

And in these results, the objective testing indicated that he had likely a primary diagnosis of a mood disorder, something like bipolar disorder, but he had chronic hypomania, not mania. And they also found that he had antisocial personality disorder, but it was so severe when assessed with psychopathic traits.

And in these results, the objective testing indicated that he had likely a primary diagnosis of a mood disorder, something like bipolar disorder, but he had chronic hypomania, not mania. And they also found that he had antisocial personality disorder, but it was so severe when assessed with psychopathic traits.

And in these results, the objective testing indicated that he had likely a primary diagnosis of a mood disorder, something like bipolar disorder, but he had chronic hypomania, not mania. And they also found that he had antisocial personality disorder, but it was so severe when assessed with psychopathic traits.

Remember, psychopathy is not a diagnosis, but his score on an assessment of psychopathy indicated that he was severe enough that it was the 98th percentile for male prison inmates and the 99th percentile for male forensic psychiatric patients.

Remember, psychopathy is not a diagnosis, but his score on an assessment of psychopathy indicated that he was severe enough that it was the 98th percentile for male prison inmates and the 99th percentile for male forensic psychiatric patients.

Remember, psychopathy is not a diagnosis, but his score on an assessment of psychopathy indicated that he was severe enough that it was the 98th percentile for male prison inmates and the 99th percentile for male forensic psychiatric patients.

This is the thing where experts have largely been sort of divided. But the way I see it, given that he had a mood disorder as a primary diagnosis based on this reevaluation, and a mood disorder is considered episodic in nature. And he also had a personality disorder. And that is not episodic in nature. That's chronic. And that's where the manipulation was really driven from.

This is the thing where experts have largely been sort of divided. But the way I see it, given that he had a mood disorder as a primary diagnosis based on this reevaluation, and a mood disorder is considered episodic in nature. And he also had a personality disorder. And that is not episodic in nature. That's chronic. And that's where the manipulation was really driven from.

This is the thing where experts have largely been sort of divided. But the way I see it, given that he had a mood disorder as a primary diagnosis based on this reevaluation, and a mood disorder is considered episodic in nature. And he also had a personality disorder. And that is not episodic in nature. That's chronic. And that's where the manipulation was really driven from.

Manson wanted fame and notoriety. This much we know. And I am not convinced, given the most recent assessments done on him and given all of the things that have been made public, including his own interviews, that that he really believed in the apocalypse. I am not convinced that he did. I'm more convinced that he needed something for his followers to believe in.

Manson wanted fame and notoriety. This much we know. And I am not convinced, given the most recent assessments done on him and given all of the things that have been made public, including his own interviews, that that he really believed in the apocalypse. I am not convinced that he did. I'm more convinced that he needed something for his followers to believe in.