Emily Mullen

There are a couple of states like California that do have more stringent protections, but there is no federal law that protects information collected in this way.

There are a couple of states like California that do have more stringent protections, but there is no federal law that protects information collected in this way.

I think we're seeing consumer DNA testing fizzle out, at least in its current form. I think people are much more aware of the privacy risks now than when these tests first came out. So I think there's been an erosion of trust with these companies for at least a couple of years now.

I think we're seeing consumer DNA testing fizzle out, at least in its current form. I think people are much more aware of the privacy risks now than when these tests first came out. So I think there's been an erosion of trust with these companies for at least a couple of years now.

I think we're seeing consumer DNA testing fizzle out, at least in its current form. I think people are much more aware of the privacy risks now than when these tests first came out. So I think there's been an erosion of trust with these companies for at least a couple of years now.

And again, for the people who went to these companies to get that ancestry information or learn about a relative, perhaps they were adopted, that sort of thing. A lot of those people have already taken these tests at this point.

And again, for the people who went to these companies to get that ancestry information or learn about a relative, perhaps they were adopted, that sort of thing. A lot of those people have already taken these tests at this point.

And again, for the people who went to these companies to get that ancestry information or learn about a relative, perhaps they were adopted, that sort of thing. A lot of those people have already taken these tests at this point.