Gregory Mostyn

speaker

336 appearances 1 recordings 1 series first heard Jun 2026 last heard 29 Jun

Gregory Mostyn’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 1 in all, peaking in Jun 2026 with 1.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment

Legally Speaking Podcast · Winning Cases with Wexler AI: Gregory Mostyn on Why The Future of Litigation Starts Here - S10E25 · 29 Jun 2026 podcast

And there's four panel firms all in that process, you know, who can get to the facts quickest and best.

Or it's for the sort of deep strategic layer, the kind of focused review for trial prep.

We have a lot of barristers using the platform and plus witness, you know, the whole witness process, deposition prep in the US, summary judgment briefing and kind of anywhere in between.

And it's jurisdictional agnostic because, as my dad says, facts have no frontier.

And it can be used across arbitration, litigation, investigations.

So very simply, we kind of distill massive data sets, no matter how messy they are, the different file types, the different formats, the complex fact patterns.

We extract the discrete observable happenings from those events, if you like.

We assign them relevance based on a list of issues that you supply.

And then you use that as the unit of analysis to create work product.

So, yeah, does that explain it?

I think it was funny.

I was talking to my, again, my dad about this.

And in the Prince Harry versus the Mirror Group case, they had to just take a very small selection of the kind of exhibits to rely on at trial because of the overriding objective of like, you know, not wasting court time, et cetera.

And it meant that actually they were only looking at a very slim number

segment of the total evidence which could be considered to resolve the dispute and I think that isn't necessarily just you know you're not looking you're not considering all the angles there could be a critical piece of information and if you're a client you're paying for something and you're not actually being represented to the fullest of the of the potential that you could be because there could be a critical piece of information that never sees the light of day because there's just too many documents to review

And so I think it's about making sure that we're not limiting justice by just how many documents humans have the capacity to read.

And usually it's like paralegals reading them in the middle of the night or, you know, busy associates at 3am.

So I think it's about making sure that clients and you know, in house

teams have the best representation and they can have their interests represented you know in in in the most in the sort of fullest sense not just about like the kind of reputation of the firm who's got more capacity to read more documents etc and then i think it's about um you know and this is actually a noble claim you know like i think ensuring those lawyers get to go home a bit earlier to see their wives and children and and not have to do the sort of drudgery and the grunt work um

um that that you know some people say it's kind of par for the course but actually we should be thinking bigger than that so i think it's about you know access to justice or maybe just you know ensuring that the full corpus of documents related to something can be analyzed and you're not just limited by the number of documents you have the capacity to read and also making the quality of life for those people and better

Showing 81–100 of 336 · page 5 of 17