Harmeet Dhillon

So we're even today in the DOJ's recent consent decree work simply ignoring binding Supreme Court precedent that says that what the police were doing in Phoenix is A-OK under the law and hoping to simply bully them into compliance. This is not what our federal government should be doing.

So we're even today in the DOJ's recent consent decree work simply ignoring binding Supreme Court precedent that says that what the police were doing in Phoenix is A-OK under the law and hoping to simply bully them into compliance. This is not what our federal government should be doing.

So we're even today in the DOJ's recent consent decree work simply ignoring binding Supreme Court precedent that says that what the police were doing in Phoenix is A-OK under the law and hoping to simply bully them into compliance. This is not what our federal government should be doing.

Why would any elected official of any party want that in the United States in 2025? Well, I don't get it. And so in these eight cases, we're getting rid of them and there will be more. I'm confident.

Why would any elected official of any party want that in the United States in 2025? Well, I don't get it. And so in these eight cases, we're getting rid of them and there will be more. I'm confident.

Why would any elected official of any party want that in the United States in 2025? Well, I don't get it. And so in these eight cases, we're getting rid of them and there will be more. I'm confident.

Well, and on top of that, there's some corrupt rent seeking as well. Let's just call it what it is. You know, there's, like I said, these white shoe lawyers. One was thrown out of a casino earlier this year. A prominent lawyer at a major law firm was thrown out of a casino. He's intoxicated. When the police came, he said, I'm with the DOJ. I'm the police monitor. And so you can't touch me.

Well, and on top of that, there's some corrupt rent seeking as well. Let's just call it what it is. You know, there's, like I said, these white shoe lawyers. One was thrown out of a casino earlier this year. A prominent lawyer at a major law firm was thrown out of a casino. He's intoxicated. When the police came, he said, I'm with the DOJ. I'm the police monitor. And so you can't touch me.

Well, and on top of that, there's some corrupt rent seeking as well. Let's just call it what it is. You know, there's, like I said, these white shoe lawyers. One was thrown out of a casino earlier this year. A prominent lawyer at a major law firm was thrown out of a casino. He's intoxicated. When the police came, he said, I'm with the DOJ. I'm the police monitor. And so you can't touch me.

Other cities have reported to us, lawyers, my colleagues in the DOJ, that if you dare complain about my bills, I'm going to keep you under a consent decree longer. I mean, it's that level of shakedown.

Other cities have reported to us, lawyers, my colleagues in the DOJ, that if you dare complain about my bills, I'm going to keep you under a consent decree longer. I mean, it's that level of shakedown.

Other cities have reported to us, lawyers, my colleagues in the DOJ, that if you dare complain about my bills, I'm going to keep you under a consent decree longer. I mean, it's that level of shakedown.

My billing. Yeah. When the bills are questioned, the city gets punished harder. So, you know... You would hope judges are looking at these things carefully. Guess what? Judges are busy and judges are not looking at them that carefully.

My billing. Yeah. When the bills are questioned, the city gets punished harder. So, you know... You would hope judges are looking at these things carefully. Guess what? Judges are busy and judges are not looking at them that carefully.

My billing. Yeah. When the bills are questioned, the city gets punished harder. So, you know... You would hope judges are looking at these things carefully. Guess what? Judges are busy and judges are not looking at them that carefully.

Well, the monitors are not being paid by the DOJ. They're being paid by the cities. So the cities that are under the lens of the DOJ are having these costs imposed on them. And there's, like I said, no accountability. There are annual conferences of the judges who impose the consent decrees, of the monitors who enjoy the fees and don't solve the problem.

Well, the monitors are not being paid by the DOJ. They're being paid by the cities. So the cities that are under the lens of the DOJ are having these costs imposed on them. And there's, like I said, no accountability. There are annual conferences of the judges who impose the consent decrees, of the monitors who enjoy the fees and don't solve the problem.

Well, the monitors are not being paid by the DOJ. They're being paid by the cities. So the cities that are under the lens of the DOJ are having these costs imposed on them. And there's, like I said, no accountability. There are annual conferences of the judges who impose the consent decrees, of the monitors who enjoy the fees and don't solve the problem.

And the city officials who think it's all kind of a game, let's have community policing and let's have a bunch of random people who have no background in dealing with crime tell the police what to do. There's annual junkets. It's an industry. It's a multi-billion dollar industry making America more unsafe for the most part.

And the city officials who think it's all kind of a game, let's have community policing and let's have a bunch of random people who have no background in dealing with crime tell the police what to do. There's annual junkets. It's an industry. It's a multi-billion dollar industry making America more unsafe for the most part.