Harsh P. Parikh

speaker

227 appearances 1 recordings 1 series first heard Jul 2026 last heard 17 Jul

Harsh P. Parikh’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 1 in all, peaking in Jul 2026 with 1.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment

AHLA's Speaking of Health Law · One Year In: Implementing the Medicaid Provisions of the Working Families Tax Cut Act · 17 Jul 2026 podcast

Like whether someone is significantly impaired, I mean, maybe two reasonable people can disagree on on that on that standard.

And they're probably

Isn't it

clear data that you can lean on to say, well, especially right, and to your point, if you can't say like, oh, this person has this diagnosis, therefore he or she is significantly impaired, you have to actually look at their condition and and sort of maybe do a more holistic subject by subject, fact by fact analysis.

And that's super burdensome.

Essentially you're multiplying the burden that was gonna be already, you know, on stakeholders here.

Yeah, so so California, I I think similarly, right?

Um the Department of Healthcare Services um has sort of it it

like many state agencies, they put out a implementation plan.

Here is what the state is going to do to implement the requirements of HR1.

And the plan really focused on automation, communication, and finding ways to minimize loss coverage.

And so um to you the point you made earlier, Ann,

This was uh you know essentially a roadmap for how uh California's Medicaid agency was going to try to soften the blow.

And essentially the way you know the the law or the regulations have been promulgated um it allows the state to not solely lean on

automated data or or existing data sets or et cetera.

Um and rather essentially as you said Anne, we do or we vigor the framework that the state um had already uh um thought about.

Um so so Lloyd, going back to to the lawsuit before we uh uh turn away, what what are the states seeking?

Um I mean, I I think we alluded to earlier, it's not going to be, you know, um the entire rule being thrown out, but what what is it exactly that the states are seeking to recover as a result of the the illegal action?

I I mean, I don't know.

I g I guess you could have a class action like the court was suggesting is the is the workaround around nationwide injunctions, right?

Showing 101–120 of 227 · page 6 of 12