Haseeb Qureshi

So to be clear, like this is true for anything that has not been optimized, okay?

So look, for example, at chess.

If you try to get Opus 4.6 to play chess, it's mediocre.

That's right.

That's right.

Now, the reason why it's so bad at chess is because they didn't try to train a chess.

They don't care.

It's just not important, right?

If you try to train a chess, it will become good at chess just like that.

Like it's obviously extremely easy at this point.

We know how to do it to create neural net based chess engines that are better than any human being who's ever existed, right?

We've had those for a decade now.

So it's simply a function of they just didn't bother because who cares?

We already have chess engines that are way cheaper to use than open AI.

So the answer is that they just didn't point their lasers at this because it's not economically valuable to do so.

When they do, you are going to know about it because they're going to start yelling it from the rooftops.

Now, the reason, I think a big part of the reason why, why have they not done it so far?

Because the thing is, getting blockchain-based tasks is not that hard.

It's all software.

It's easy to create an EVM simulator to simulate the state of the blockchain, to test whether or not you accomplished this task of, you know, did you recursively borrow this thing or did you sell this thing for that thing?