Ilan Srulovicz

On the one hand, people need to rise and at the same time say, wait, we are negotiating.

It's confusing the head out of everyone.

I think that the best way to articulate this is to say that, and that's something that we have said, that the boots on the ground in Iran are the Iranian people themselves.

We don't need to have foreign troops doing the job for us.

But in order for people to be emboldened and have a fair fighting chance,

Unlike what happened in January 8th and 9th when they were massacred to the tune of over 40,000 people in less than 48 hours, how could you expect the people to be the elements on the ground if they don't get the appropriate protection or cover?

We can only call to this action by people being on the streets again when they have that level of an equal fighting chance.

not why the regime can deploy their thugs to murder people on the streets.

That's why we needed to have the air campaign.

That's why we needed to have the aerial protection.

And I think that's where you can generate the element on the grounds that will not require... So here's the question.

Send mixed signals on the one hand said people need to rise and at the same time say wait we are negotiating It's confusing the hell out of everyone.

I think this is a very big day, very important day.

It's too easy.

So it's got to be something that people will pay for, because that's a signal.

Pablo, you coming home?

Come to Florida.

You are a one-on-one?

My son's right there.

Bet on yourself.