Illia Polosukhin

And it was trying to make more money.

So it was like an investment.

And so it used Near Intense to effectively trade on all the assets and had Twitter access to see where the sentiment is.

And, you know, it was like up at some points, down at some points.

But it's a good example of this concept where, yeah, you're effectively, because of decentralized infrastructure, like you can do this right now.

You can actually spin it up and then, you know, a smart contract can pay for inference and compute.

And you have kind of this full autonomy.

I think where practically this is going to go is more, I call it like autonomous businesses, right?

where you still have, like, it still should have some mission, right?

Like, I think, you know, creating, like, this AI organisms that don't have any, like, any specific mission with, I think this is, I mean, this is cool and people will do it.

Like, I mean, we had Conway, right, where they just, like, multiply.

But I think what's interesting is more like, hey, you know, how do we solve global warming, right, climate change?

We set up one as a mission.

It can accept donations.

It can raise funds through a token.

And then the token holders become the governance layer of this, right?

They can effectively update the mission.

They can vote on some updates to system prompt or provide additional guidance.

So I think that structure is actually where the AI tokens should be.

If there is an AI token, it should be attached to it.