Ivan Barabanov

Where are we going with this?

For sure.

The dogs will be the judges that kind of direct, give the direction where we're heading to.

That's not human brain.

Yes, very valid point.

I think, you know what is really interesting is that probably the vast majority of competitors agree on this.

And in fact, you know, like anytime I talk to IGP trainers and judges and like I always, I think, you know how we would say, well,

Two judges is a good thing.

But then there is this kind of argument about, well, two judges, but one stay on that corner and they don't share.

And I'm like, no, they should share information because that's the whole idea of, well, I have a little brain fart, but the other judge actually catches it.

i think it's good to communicate because no problem you you build uh uh okay this is what we are judging and now we have four eyes looking for the same thing um you know correct i agree 100 because i think because you know what i think like some some competitors almost

want to turn it into a game of, okay, well, there is this judge there and this judge there, and the one's going to give 89 points because maybe they missed something, and the other one's going to give 95 points, and ha, ha, ha, let's see them.

That's not the point, right?

finish so what in your opinion what is the hold back why why why we cannot implement this because it seems so reasonable and i don't think there is much resistance against having two judges but somehow it's so easy it happens here and there but it's not like accepted as a

Right, right.

man pierre what's your take like like this is actually a question that i have almost i mean i mean i'm kind of sure because a lot of there is always conversations along those lines but but now i have two dogs that i have to they're almost as i was telling you earlier when we started i have a female and a male that are super young well not young enough i have to do the bh and do the igp one now

And, and I'm at the point right now that I have to go back and really study the rules for IGP one, because I, I, I mean, everything from when I did IGP one, things have changed dramatically of what the requirements were.

What, what do you think, why are we doing like, I guess my question is if somebody is going towards

level three but they have to train something for level one that only is very specific for level one and it doesn't really

even give a progression towards where you really are training.