Jonathan Fields

So if we have these different things that are sort of invisibly influencing the way that we seek partnership and also step into and actively engage in the process and the experience, it sounds so technical when I say that.

It's like...

Let's just talk about that for a second, though, right?

Because this has got to be one of the things that I would imagine gets brought to you, too.

People are like, I just want to fall in love.

I want the feeling.

I want that thing.

And does it have to be this sort of technical, mechanical, step-by-step intellectual process for me to actually find the thing that I so dearly want?

Or where's the dream part of this?

Where's the softness to it?

Yeah, it was, I feel like it's really easy to sort of like go down this slippery slope of saying, we can break this down to a highly mechanical process.

But like, there's a voice inside so many people that say, like, isn't this supposed to be just more, more intuitive, more emotional, more soft, more alive with electricity?

Or is it a yes and thing?

There's a stat that I've heard.

Tell me if this is actually true.

that 100% of the coupling, the partners that you have helped sort of facilitate through your approach, your methodology, are still together?

Yeah, true, true.

Walk me through then sort of on a high, I realize there's a massive amount of really in-depth, high level of personalization, tailoring, customization.

But I'm really curious now, walk me through on sort of like a meta level, a high level of the core elements, the core steps, however you would sort of define it of this methodology.

Well, I mean, I think the trope would be sense of humor.