Kane Parsons

So I wanted to make sure that we could have a stable, viable version of a film that is not going to risk falling into a bit of an insane, contrived or convoluted territory.

I think it's easy to over-rely on symbolism and the thematics of a project.

I...

I don't, I do it immensely.

So, so the answer, the quick answer is yes, it's all, I have a version of it.

The great thing about thematics is that people are probably going to have a many, many different interpretations of it.

And, and so that's why that's actually the bit I like to speak to the least probably.

I mean, you can probably just, if you were to comb over all the interviews, all the press I've done, you could probably get like a flavor of the way I think about this project.

But I, I do think that that's the least interesting thing I could prescribe to people.

Like I, if it was up to me, I like, I like trying to,

In a perfect world, I guess I mainly am just fatigued with seeing creators after their project ends or...

you know, after the project ends, like going on and talking about what it all means in a way that is somehow like, if it's not clear in the product, then you could try again.

Or like, I want it to be on the screen.

And, and this film is not supposed to be like, you're not supposed to get like a hard read out of it.

Exactly.

In terms of like, this is precisely what it means in very exact explicit terms.

But it is there.

And I'm seeing enough people saying,

arriving to the same sort of conversational talking points that I was hoping they would, that obviously aren't mentioned in the film anywhere.

So I feel like that works.