Katie Phang
speaker
1,864 appearances
8 recordings
3 series
first heard May 2025
last heard 12 Sep
Katie Phang’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 7 in all, peaking in Aug 2026 with 3.
Appearances
none of these lawyers from the Department of Justice representing Todd Blanch today knew what the hell was going on.
Especially this guy Andrew Block, whether you think it was an intentional thing where he could sit there and feign ignorance with Judge Sullivan or he legit sincerely didn't know because he had just been dropped into or parachuted into this case, who knows?
But it was very evident the second that Judge Sullivan took the bench that this guy did not know and did not have answers, and that did not go well with Judge Sullivan at all.
So I'm gonna go to my notes and I'm gonna walk through them with you because I wanna make sure that you guys also have the full flavor of what happened.
The judge immediately started with the redactions for the names of the victims that Todd Blanche claims have either self-identified or identified through counsel that they are victims.
And that's the reason why their names or their email addresses have been redacted from these documents that were provided to Judge Sullivan in an unredacted form for an in-camera or an in-chambers review.
There was a second binder.
We don't know what's inside of it, but according to this lawyer, Andrew Block, this second binder that was handed up to the judge today contained the quote corroborating documentation that the judge had originally ordered from Todd Blanche that would substantiate the claim that the redactions pertained to people, again, who claim that they are victims or they have either self-identified, excuse me, or
they used lawyers to identify themselves as victims.
Andrew Block says that the second binder handed up to the judge is a quote representative sample of this victims in this case, and that according to the attorney review protocol, which I've covered here before, which was just made up by the DOJ and was not done in compliance, frankly, with the Epstein File Transparency Act, because it expands the DOJ's um
spectrum of redactions and withholdings,
There is a quote, sliding scale of documentation available to the DOJ when it comes to people being able to identify themselves as victims.
The department didn't weigh on the amount, didn't consider the amount of information.
They just took at face value a representation by a victim or by their counsel, and that's how they applied the redactions.
So that is what Andrew Bloch told the judge.
The judge said, I will look.
Look at your submission of the second binder and I will look at it privately in chambers and I will advise.
Now with regards to those interview notes, the handwritten interview notes by the FBI agents of that thirteen year old girl who alleges that of the woman who alleges when she was thirteen that she was sexually abused by Donald Trump and physically battered.
According to this DOJ lawyer Andrew Block, because those handwritten FBI notes are duplicative of the FBI 302s, which are like the official reports that are generated, that's why they're not turning them over.
And the judge pressed him and said, I don't understand.
Showing 21–40 of 1,864 · page 2 of 94
← Previous
Next →