Kevin Park

speaker
18,803 appearances 75 recordings 2 series first heard Sep 2023 last heard 4d ago

Kevin Park’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months
3 · Sep OctJan 26AprJulnow

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 22 in all, peaking in Sep 2026 with 3.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment
be in sync with the changes that the state or the county made, or we could choose not to do that.
But I'm thinking, why don't we make that explicit?
Because explicit is much more, it's much better than implicit when it comes to qualifications and rules, right?
But we talk about qualifications for duties, but we don't talk about, I mean, it's not logical to talk about the duties if we don't have qualifications or requirements for that duty.
And we're talking about qualifications only.
We're not talking requirements or actually what's required there.
If qualifications for a duty are absent, it's not logical to talk about the duties.
And if the qualifications for a position are not required, why do we have that position?
I mean, we talk about the police chief, and the police chief is supposed to be a lieutenant and is posted officer.
And I believe when I looked at the sheriff's site, that's required there too.
I mean, it sounds like lieutenant is a really high position because it's a management group, but it's the lowest position in the management group.
And I think that recent memory, most of the people that have become police chief have not been in that position for more than a year, let alone two years.
But it's hard to tell if the requirements in the document are two years as a posted officer, which I think that's a minimum, or if it's two years as a lieutenant, which is not clear.
We looked at where we add, these were not supposed to be controversial, but we are adding a lot of requirements, sorry, a lot of capabilities and powers where they did not previously exist.
When we talk about the mayor, and now the mayor can do a lot of things without having to justify what they're doing.
I remember in the 2025, the October 30th meeting, where the city attorney basically said, well, the charter allows the mayor to do this.
Relatively straightforward, allows the mayor to make changes, prevents the mayor from
But the charter had none of that language, and now it looks like we're adding this kind of language in.
I want to know what kind of slippery slope we're doing by adding, giving additional powers where they were not before, when this was supposed to be a clarification.
I feel that we are adding so many different things.
Showing 1301–1320 of 18,803 · page 66 of 941 ← Previous Next →