Menu
Sign In Pricing Add Podcast

Law and Crime Network

Appearances

KAREN: THE RETRIAL

Flirts and Googles: S1-E6

10.655

This is a Law and Crime Network presentation.

KAREN: THE RETRIAL

Flirts and Googles: S1-E6

1371.663

Celebrate is one of the gold standard products out there to use for cell phone imaging and analysis.

KAREN: THE RETRIAL

Flirts and Googles: S1-E6

1761.286

I think part of the disconnect in this particular case is that person who originally did the imaging, which I believe might have been the state police, used an older version of Celebrite where the other person who found additional data used a newer version.

KAREN: THE RETRIAL

Flirts and Googles: S1-E6

1965.476

It doesn't make sense to me if we can't trust the times that we extract from cell phones because all that data that they talked about, well, you can't do two searches at one time and there was another search being done exactly at 2.27. Okay, let's assume that's correct.

KAREN: THE RETRIAL

Flirts and Googles: S1-E6

1981.566

Why is the first search correct and a valid search at 2.27, but the other one not a valid search at 2.27, that it really occurred at 6.28? They just are anomalies that if they're not explained, then they shouldn't be allowed to be put in as evidence. They both can't be right.

KAREN: THE RETRIAL

Flirts and Googles: S1-E6

2608.696

Anytime anybody gets rid of anything, it's either called spoliation of evidence or destruction of evidence. Who are you to decide what's important or not? Once there's litigation involved, your normal course of business goes out the window. But what would be more important is exactly when he got rid of that SIM card and what he thought was contained on that SIM card.

KAREN: THE RETRIAL

Flirts and Googles: S1-E6

2631.404

But people get rid of things for a reason, and that's important. The ultimate fate of the SIM card was revealed.

KAREN: THE RETRIAL

Flirts and Googles: S1-E6

68.92

Anytime anybody gets rid of anything, it's either called spoliation of evidence or destruction of evidence. Who are you to decide what's important or not?

KAREN: THE RETRIAL

In Search of Reasonable Doubt: S1-E5

10.575

This is a Law & Crime Network presentation.

KAREN: THE RETRIAL

In Search of Reasonable Doubt: S1-E5

2575.641

Although I didn't know him well, I considered him to be a friend and our relationship was very, very good, cordial. And, you know, I considered him to be somebody that I could hang out with and have a good time with.

KAREN: THE RETRIAL

In Search of Reasonable Doubt: S1-E5

2635.14

Initially, and then I remembered that I had met her once.

KAREN: THE RETRIAL

In Search of Reasonable Doubt: S1-E5

2644.286

That portion of that sentence is false.

KAREN: THE RETRIAL

In Search of Reasonable Doubt: S1-E5

2665.515

Absolutely not. I wish he had.