Marjorie Hernandez

speaker
834 appearances 31 recordings 1 series first heard Nov 2024 last heard 16 Sep

Marjorie Hernandez’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months
1 · Sep OctJan 26AprJulnow

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 2 in all, peaking in Sep 2026 with 1.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment
And with that being said, here we are with Rochelle Keehan. Thank you so much for appearing on the pod, Rochelle.
Can you tell us a little bit more about your background and the collective liberty?
And it's definitely a problem worldwide. The good work that you're doing out there is just highlighting that. But in connection with the Diddy case, however, obviously he is facing trafficking charges as well in this federal case out in New York. Just to give our listeners a little update on the case itself. So Diddy appeared in court last Friday, April 18th.
And there was a lot of pretrial motions that was discussed. I'm sure Rochelle can go over that with us. One of the things that happened is the judge did allow three alleged victims to testify under their pseudonyms and not their true legal names, but Cassie Ventura, who's Diddy's ex, plans to testify under her name.
But something else that happened that I was hoping Rochelle can dive into, the judge also issued a very important order that was pretty much a win for Diddy by granting his motion to exclude testimony about prior bad acts from all but one proposed witness. And I was hoping you can explain what are prior bad act witnesses and also how this decision could affect the case itself.
That's interesting. So it can be argued again at some point during trial whether or not these uncharged victims could come in and testify. Yeah.
One of the interesting things I also saw that a minor might be a possible witness. And we haven't seen an actual, again, charge involving a minor in the allegations against Diddy. However, how does that play in the case?
Now Diddy has claimed his innocence. He said he's not guilty. And he says that these were all consensual threesomes and these alleged freak offs. But you know, in a case like this, it does come down to he said, she said, and I was wondering how how do you prep your witnesses as a prosecutor in such a case like this? And in this case, it's a huge case against a celebrity.
But can you also talk about how Cassie's decision to actually come out and use her own name in court, how that could also affect the case and even how jurors might perceive her?
You mentioned that video. That was a 2016 video of Cassie fleeing inside a hotel hallway. She was trying to go down the elevator and we see Diddy pulling her back by her hair. which that video was released by CNN and went viral. Can you tell me how important that video was to this case?
And also the fact that he's not being charged with battery and sexual assault, like you said, but why this particular video is so important.
Right. And obviously Diddy's attorneys is trying to keep that Cassie video out of the trial and also other videos as well. So we shall see what actually ends up in front of the jury. And speaking about, you know, consent, the other uncharged victims said, The fact that they also allegedly went through this with him, but there's no sexual assault or even arrest of Diddy for all these years.
How do you think that will play out in court when they finally have a chance to testify, even though they're not named as victims on the complaint?
There's so much more coming up. But for now, let's pause for a break.
Welcome back to The Trial of Diddy. We're still here with Rochelle Keehan. Now, we obviously were talking about Diddy, who's in trial in his criminal case in New York, but other sources that I've spoken to said he didn't do this alone, this was an enterprise, and that this is why he got away with it, allegedly, for so long.
Can you talk about the potential of other charges this could bring about to other folks who are around this circle?
Wow. So you're thinking that there could be other, since they went for the big fish, Diddy himself, that there could be potential, I guess, arrests in the future once it all plays out in court.
Right. Diddy is facing dozens of civil lawsuits right now. I wonder if that will play also into what happens in criminal court and vice versa.
When you have powerful, famous folks like a Sean Combs go to trial for human trafficking and sexual assault cases, how do you think that affects how the public sees these cases?
You brought up a good point that when you think about human trafficking, you think, you know, a boogeyman who comes and kidnaps a child or a woman and puts them into sex slavery, essentially. But it's not often that at all. It's somebody who they trusted.
Showing 501–520 of 834 · page 26 of 42 ← Previous Next →